The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Power laws and distributions with heavy tails are common features of many complex systems. Examples are the distribution of earthquake magnitudes, solar flare intensities and the sizes of neuronal avalanches. Previously, researchers surmised that a single general concept may act as an underlying generative mechanism, with the theory of self organized criticality being a weighty contender. The power-law scaling observed in the primary statistical analysis is an important, but by far not the only feature characterizing experimental data. The scaling function, the distribution of energy fluctuations, the distribution of inter-event waiting times, and other higher order spatial and temporal correlations, have seen increased consideration over the last years. Leading to realization that basic models, like the original sandpile model, are often insufficient to adequately describe the complexity of real-world systems with power-law distribution. Consequently, a substantial amount of effort has gone into developing new and extended models and, hitherto, three classes of models have emerged. The first line of models is based on a separation between the time scales of an external drive and an internal dissipation, and includes the original sandpile model and its extensions, like the dissipative earthquake model. Within this approach the steady state is close to criticality in terms of an absorbing phase transition. The second line of models is based on external drives and internal dynamics competing on similar time scales and includes the coherent noise model, which has a non-critical steady state characterized by heavy-tailed distributions. The third line of models proposes a non-critical self-organizing state, being guided by an optimization principle, such as the concept of highly optimized tolerance. We present a comparative overview regarding distinct modeling approaches together with a discussion of their potential relevance as underlying generative models for real-world phenomena. The complexity of physical and biological scaling phenomena has been found to transcend the explanatory power of individual paradigmal concepts. The interaction between theoretical development and experimental observations has been very fruitful, leading to a series of novel concepts and insights.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. R., & Newman, M. E. J. (2009) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/070710111 · Cited by 8,019
Self-organized criticality: An explanation of the 1/f noise
Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.381 · Cited by 7,591
Newman (2005) · doi:10.1080/00107510500052444 · Cited by 5,749
Erdős, P., & Rényi, A. (2022) · Publicationes Mathematicae Debrecen · doi:10.5486/pmd.1959.6.3-4.12 · Cited by 5,337
Broder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A., & Wiener, J. (2000) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(00)00083-9 · Cited by 2,810
Neuronal Avalanches in Neocortical Circuits
Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-35-11167.2003 · Cited by 2,325
Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.025102 · Cited by 2,093
A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
Price, D. D. S. (1976) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630270505 · Cited by 2,035
Cited by
Self-organized criticality as a fundamental property of neural systems
Hesse, J., & Gross, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00166 · Cited by 440
Multiplex visibility graphs to investigate recurrent neural network dynamics
Bianchi, F. M., Livi, L., Alippi, C., & Jenssen, R. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44037 · Cited by 41
Radiolysis Generates a Complex Organosynthetic Chemical Network
Adam, Z., Fahrenbach, A. C., Jacobson, S. M., Kacar, B., & Zubarev, D. Y. (2019) · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.10148684 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Marković, D., & Gros, C.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 536
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 41-74
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091872011
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.11.002
- The paper
- Marković, D., & Gros, C. (2014). Power laws and self-organized criticality in theory and nature. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2013.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.