The DOI matches its Crossref record; 605 of the 605 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum entanglement in condensed matter systems
Open accessAbstract
This review focuses on the field of quantum entanglement applied to condensed matter physics systems with strong correlations, a domain which has rapidly grown over the last decade. By tracing out part of the degrees of freedom of correlated quantum systems, useful and non-trivial informations can be obtained through the study of the reduced density matrix, whose eigenvalue spectrum (the entanglement spectrum) and the associated Renyi entropies are now well recognized to contains key features. In particular, the celebrated area law for the entanglement entropy of ground-states will be discussed from the perspective of its subleading corrections which encode universal details of various quantum states of matter, e.g. symmetry breaking states or topological order. Going beyond entropies, the study of the low-lying part of the entanglement spectrum also allows to diagnose topological properties or give a direct access to the excitation spectrum of the edges, and may also raise significant questions about the underlying entanglement Hamiltonian. All these powerful tools can be further applied to shed some light on disordered quantum systems where impurity/disorder can conspire with quantum fluctuations to induce non-trivial effects. Disordered quantum spin systems, the Kondo effect, or the many-body localization problem, which have all been successfully (re)visited through the prism of quantum entanglement, will be discussed in details. Finally, the issue of experimental access to entanglement measurement will be addressed, together with its most recent developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 601–605 of 605
Entanglement entropy near Kondo-destruction quantum critical points
Pixley, J. H., Chowdhury, T., Miecnikowski, M., Stephens, J., Wagner, C., & Ingersent, K. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.245122 · Cited by 9
Impurity entanglement in theJ–J2–δ quantum spin chain
Deschner, A., & Sørensen, E. S. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2011/10/p10023 · Cited by 9
Rényi entropy perspective on topological order in classical toric code models
Helmes, J., Stéphan, J.-M., & Trebst, S. (2015) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.125144 · Cited by 8
Dynamics of the impurity screening cloud following quantum quenches of the resonant level model
Ghosh, S., Ribeiro, P., & Haque, M. (2015) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 7
Dynamics of the impurity screening cloud following quantum quenches of the resonant level model
Ghosh, S., Ribeiro, P., & Haque, M. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2015/08/p08002 · Cited by 6
Cited by
Dynamical quantum phase transitions: a review
Heyl, M. (2018) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaaf9a · Cited by 678
Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics
Alet, F., & Laflorencie, N. (2018) · Comptes Rendus. Physique · doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2018.03.003 · Cited by 640
Self-citationDirect Observation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in an Interacting Many-Body System
Jurcevic, P., Shen, H., Hauke, P., Maier, C., Brydges, T., Hempel, C., Lanyon, B. P., Heyl, M., Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.080501 · Cited by 536
Entanglement entropy: Holography and renormalization group
Nishioka, T. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035007 · Cited by 287
Turkeshi, X., Biella, A., Fazio, R., Dalmonte, M., & Schiró, M. (2021) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.224210 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Laflorencie, N.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 646
- Pages
- 1-59
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2271921877
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 605
- FWCI
- 32.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.