The DOI matches its Crossref record; 193 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The BCS–BEC crossover: From ultra-cold Fermi gases to nuclear systems
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This report addresses topics and questions of common interest in the fields of ultra-cold gases and nuclear physics in the context of the BCS–BEC crossover. By this crossover, the phenomena of Bardeen–Cooper–Schrieffer (BCS) superfluidity and Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC), which share the same kind of spontaneous symmetry breaking, are smoothly connected through the progressive reduction of the size of the fermion pairs involved as the fundamental entities in both phenomena. This size ranges, from large values when Cooper pairs are strongly overlapping in the BCS limit of a weak inter-particle attraction, to small values when composite bosons are non-overlapping in the BEC limit of a strong inter-particle attraction, across the intermediate unitarity limit where the size of the pairs is comparable with the average inter-particle distance. The BCS–BEC crossover has recently been realized experimentally, and essentially in all of its aspects, with ultra-cold Fermi gases. This realization, in turn, has raised the interest of the nuclear physics community in the crossover problem, since it represents an unprecedented tool to test fundamental and unanswered questions of nuclear many-body theory. Here, we focus on the several aspects of the BCS–BEC crossover, which are of broad joint interest to both ultra-cold Fermi gases and nuclear matter, and which will likely help to solve in the future some open problems in nuclear physics (concerning, for instance, neutron stars). Similarities and differences occurring in ultra-cold Fermi gases and nuclear matter will then be emphasized, not only about the relative phenomenologies but also about the theoretical approaches to be used in the two contexts. Common to both contexts is the fact that at zero temperature the BCS–BEC crossover can be described at the mean-field level with reasonable accuracy. At finite temperature, on the other hand, inclusion of pairing fluctuations beyond mean field represents an essential ingredient of the theory, especially in the normal phase where they account for precursor pairing effects. After an introduction to present the key concepts of the BCS–BEC crossover, this report discusses the mean-field treatment of the superfluid phase, both for homogeneous and inhomogeneous systems, as well as for symmetric (spin- or isospin-balanced) and asymmetric (spin- or isospin-imbalanced) matter. Pairing fluctuations in the normal phase are then considered, with their manifestations in thermodynamic and dynamic quantities. The last two Sections provide a more specialized discussion of the BCS–BEC crossover in ultra-cold Fermi gases and nuclear matter, respectively. The separate discussion in the two contexts aims at cross communicating to both communities topics and aspects which, albeit arising in one of the two fields, share a strong common interest.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 · Cited by 13,213
Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensities and Phase Shifts
Fano, U. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.124.1866 · Cited by 11,165
Many-body physics with ultracold gases
Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., & Zwerger, W. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.885 · Cited by 8,114
Theory of Bose-Einstein condensation in trapped gases
Dalfovo, F., Giorgini, S., Pitaevskii, L. P., & Stringari, S. (1999) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.463 · Cited by 5,701
Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling
Josephson, B. D. (1962) · Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0031-9163(62)91369-0 · Cited by 4,130
Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases
Chin, C., Grimm, R., Julienne, P., & Tiesinga, E. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1225 · Cited by 3,855
Mott, N. F. (1969) · Philosophical Magazine · doi:10.1080/14786436908216338 · Cited by 3,520
Superconductivity in a Strong Spin-Exchange Field
Fulde, P., & Ferrell, R. A. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.135.a550 · Cited by 3,256
A unified theory of nuclear reactions. II
Feshbach, H. (1962) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/0003-4916(62)90221-x · Cited by 2,864
Viscosity in Strongly Interacting Quantum Field Theories from Black Hole Physics
Kovtun, P. K., Son, D. T., & Starinets, A. O. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.111601 · Cited by 2,836
Metadata
- Authors
- Strinati, G. C., Pieri, P., Röpke, G., Schuck, P., & Urban, M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 738
- Pages
- 1-76
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2786587936
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 193
- FWCI
- 13.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The BCS–BEC crossover: From ultra-cold Fermi gases to nuclear systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.02.004
- The paper
- Strinati, G. C., Pieri, P., Röpke, G., Schuck, P., & Urban, M. (2018). The BCS–BEC crossover: From ultra-cold Fermi gases to nuclear systems. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.02.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.