The DOI matches its Crossref record; 209 of the 209 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The standard model as an effective field theory
Open accessAbstract
Projecting measurements of the interactions of the known Standard Model (SM) states into an effective field theory (EFT) framework is an important goal of the LHC physics program. The interpretation of measurements of the properties of the Higgs-like boson in an EFT allows one to consistently study the properties of this state, while the SM is allowed to eventually break down at higher energies. In this review, basic concepts relevant to the construction of such EFTs are reviewed pedagogically. Electroweak precision data is discussed as a historical example of some importance to illustrate critical consistency issues in interpreting experimental data in EFTs. A future precision Higgs phenomenology program can benefit from the projection of raw experimental results into consistent field theories such as the SM, the SM supplemented with higher dimensional operators (the SMEFT) or an Electroweak chiral Lagrangian with a dominantly $J^P = 0^+$ scalar (the HEFT). We discuss the developing SMEFT and HEFT approaches, that are consistent versions of such EFTs, systematically improvable with higher order corrections, and comment on the pseudo-observable approach. We review the challenges that have been overcome in developing EFT methods for LHC studies, and the challenges that remain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 · Cited by 13,213
Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1502.01589 · Cited by 10,720
Planck 2015 results: XIII. Cosmological parameters
Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartlett, J. G., et al. (2016) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830 · Cited by 10,583
Aad, G., Abajyan, T., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Abdel Khalek, S., Abdelalim, A. A., Abdinov, O., Aben, R., Abi, B., Abolins, M., et al. (2012) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020 · Cited by 10,526
Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC
Chatrchyan, S., Khachatryan, V., Sirunyan, A. M., Tumasyan, A., Adam, W., Aguilo, E., Bergauer, T., Dragicevic, M., Erö, J., Fabjan, C., et al. (2012) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021 · Cited by 9,874
Weinberg, S. (1967) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 · Cited by 7,451
Olive, K. A. (2016) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001 · Cited by 7,334
Olive, K. A. (2014) · Chinese Physics C · doi:10.1088/1674-1137/38/9/090001 · Cited by 6,897
Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation
Mohapatra, R. N., & Senjanović, G. (1980) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.44.912 · Cited by 5,851
Evidence for Oscillation of Atmospheric Neutrinos
Fukuda, Y., Hayakawa, T., Ichihara, E., Inoue, K., Ishihara, K., Ishino, H., Itow, Y., Kajita, T., Kameda, J., Kasuga, S., et al. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.81.1562 · Cited by 5,067
Metadata
- Authors
- Brivio, I., & Trott, M.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 793
- Pages
- 1-98
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2730968276
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 209
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The standard model as an effective field theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002
- The paper
- Brivio, I., & Trott, M. (2019). The standard model as an effective field theory. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
