The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
The quark model was formulated in 1964 to classify mesons as bound states made of a quark-antiquark pair, and baryons as bound states made of three quarks. For a long time all known mesons and baryons could be classified within this scheme. Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD), however, in principle also allows the existence of more complex structures, generically called exotic hadrons or simply exotics. These include four-quark hadrons (tetraquarks and hadronic molecules), five-quark hadrons (pentaquarks) and states with active gluonic degrees of freedom (hybrids), and even states of pure glue (glueballs). Exotic hadrons have been systematically searched for in numerous experiments for many years. Remarkably, in the past fifteen years, many new hadrons that do not exhibit the expected properties of ordinary (not exotic) hadrons have been discovered in the quarkonium spectrum. These hadrons are collectively known as $XYZ$ states. Some of them, like the charged states, are undoubtedly exotic. Parallel to the experimental progress, the last decades have also witnessed an enormous theoretical effort to reach a theoretical understanding of the $XYZ$ states. Theoretical approaches include not only phenomenological extensions of the quark model to exotics, but also modern non-relativistic effective field theories and lattice QCD calculations. The present work aims at reviewing the rapid progress in the field of exotic $XYZ$ hadrons over the past few years both in experiments and theory. It concludes with a summary on future prospects and challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modern theory of nuclear forces
Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W., & Meißner, U.-G. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1773 · Cited by 1,883
Cited by
Science Requirements and Detector Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider
Abdul Khalek, R., Accardi, A., Adam, J., Adamiak, D., Akers, W., Albaladejo, M., Al-bataineh, A., Alexeev, M. G., Ameli, F., Antonioli, P., et al. (2022) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2022.122447 · Cited by 913
An updated review of the new hadron states
Chen, H.-X., Chen, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y.-R., & Zhu, S.-L. (2023) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6 · Cited by 594
Observation of an exotic narrow doubly charmed tetraquark
LHCb Collaboration, Aaij, R., Abdelmotteleb, A. S. W., Abellán Beteta, C., Abudinen Gallego, F. J., Ackernley, T., Adeva, B., Adinolfi, M., Afsharnia, H., Agapopoulou, C., et al. (2022) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01614-y · Cited by 384
Self-citationStudy of the doubly charmed tetraquark $${{{{{{\rm{T}}}}}}}_{{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}{{{{{\rm{c}}}}}}}^{+}$$
LHCb collaboration, Aaij, R., Abdelmotteleb, A. S. W., Beteta, C. A., Gallego, F. J. A., Ackernley, T., Adeva, B., Adinolfi, M., Afsharnia, H., Agapopoulou, C., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30206-w · Cited by 331
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Hanhart, C., Nefediev, A., Shen, C.-P., Thomas, C. E., Vairo, A., & Yuan, C.-Z.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 873
- Pages
- 1-154
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3027321527
- Cited by
- 884
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001
- The paper
- Brambilla, N., Eidelman, S., Hanhart, C., Nefediev, A., Shen, C.-P., Thomas, C. E., Vairo, A., & Yuan, C.-Z. (2020). The XYZ states: Experimental and theoretical status and perspectives. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.