Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 657

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 455 of the 455 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The landscape of QCD axion models

Open access
Di Luzio, Luca, Giannotti, Maurizio, Nardi, Enrico, Visinelli, Luca·2020·Physics Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We review the landscape of QCD axion models. Theoretical constructions that extend the window for the axion mass and couplings beyond conventional regions are highlighted and classified. Bounds from cosmology, astrophysics and experimental searches are reexamined and updated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002

Cites

455 of 455 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 401–455 of 455

Cited by

See all 657

Metadata

Authors
Di Luzio, L., Giannotti, M., Nardi, E., & Visinelli, L.
Venue
Physics Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
870
Pages
1-117
ISSN
0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.physrep.2020.06.002
OpenAlex
W3008473238
Cited by
657
References
455
FWCI
36.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.