Cited by 40Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionDysphagia Assessment and Management

The influence of NDT-Bobath and PNF methods on the field support and total path length measure foot pressure (COP) in patients after stroke

Krukowska, Jolanta, Bugajski, Marcin, Sienkiewicz, Monika, Czernicki, Jan·2016·Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska

Abstract

In stroke patients, the NDT - (Bobath - Neurodevelopmental Treatment) and PNF (Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation) methods are used to achieve the main objective of rehabilitation, which aims at the restoration of maximum patient independence in the shortest possible period of time (especially the balance of the body). The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of the NDT-Bobath and PNF methods on the field support and total path length measure foot pressure (COP) in patients after stroke. The study included 72 patients aged from 20 to 69 years after ischemic stroke with Hemiparesis. The patients were divided into 4 groups by a simple randomization. The criteria for this division were: the body side (right or left) affected by paresis and the applied rehabilitation methods. All the patients were applied the recommended kinesitherapeutic method (randomized), 35 therapy sessions, every day for a period of six weeks. Before initiation of therapy and after 6 weeks was measured the total area of the support and path length (COP (Center Of Pressure) measure foot pressure) using stabilometer platform - alpha. The results were statistically analyzed. After treatment studied traits decreased in all groups. The greatest improvement was obtained in groups with NDT-Bobath therapy. NDT-Bobath method for improving the balance of the body is a more effective method of treatment in comparison with of the PNF method. In stroke patients, the effectiveness of NDT-Bobath method does not depend on hand paresis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pjnns.2016.08.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 40

Authors
Krukowska, J., Bugajski, M., Sienkiewicz, M., & Czernicki, J.
Affiliations
Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Corresponding author
Sienkiewicz, Monika
Venue
Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska
Published
2016-11
Volume
50
Issue
6
Pages
449-454
ISSN
0028-3843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2514289829
Cited by
40
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurologia i Neurochirurgia Polska (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Uniwersytet Łódzki
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
stroke rehabilitation, Bobath therapy, neurodevelopmental treatment, proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, center of pressure, postural sway, balance, hemiparesis, ischemic stroke, path length
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Adult, Aged, Postural Balance, Female, Foot, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Paresis, Pressure, Stroke, Muscle Stretching Exercises, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review