Cited by 155Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesBirth, Development, and HealthReproductive System and Pregnancy

Review: Transport across the placenta of mice and women

Dilworth, M.R., Sibley, C.P.·2013·Placenta

Abstract

Since the advent of technologies to produce genetic knockout and transgenic mice, the number of mouse strains suggested to be useful as models for pregnancy-related complications in the human has risen substantially. Some of these share features in common with fetal growth restriction (FGR) and preeclampsia (PE) and could be useful for investigating aetiologies and for testing potential therapeutics to improve outcome in these diseases. However, since placental pathology is a major underlying factor in both FGR and PE, it is important to understand the similarities and differences in structure and function of the placenta between mice and women. The main aim of this review is to directly compare placental exchange physiology between human and mouse. The review will compare human and mouse in both normal and pathological circumstances, to attempt to answer the question of whether placental studies in the mouse can be translated to the human. The review includes descriptions of placental structure between the species, comparisons of nutrient transport, including amino acids, glucose and calcium, and evidence of how these transport systems are altered in both human FGR and mouse models of this disease. Finally, our review will conclude by examining studies in which mouse models of FGR/PE have been treated with drugs of potential therapeutic value in women and consider whether data obtained in mice can be a prelude for clinical trials in human.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.placenta.2012.10.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For nutrients actively transported to the fetus, reduced placental permeability may enhance net transfer by preventing back-flux of nutrients into the placenta.

    “Indeed, for nutrients actively transported to the fetus, the reduced placental permeability may enhance net transfer by preventing back-flux of nutrients into the placenta (150).”

    From Placental Origins of Chronic Disease (2016) · cites this paper as [150]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 155

Authors
Dilworth, M. R., & Sibley, C. P.
Affiliations
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Corresponding author
Dilworth, M.R.
Venue
Placenta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
34
Pages
S34-S39
ISSN
0143-4004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022674441
Cited by
155
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Placenta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • MRC Programme Grant
  • Action Medical Research Endowment Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
placental transport, human-mouse comparison, fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, nutrient transport, amino acid transport, glucose transport, calcium transport, translational research
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Transport, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Placenta, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy, Animal, Species Specificity, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review