BLADE-ON-PETIOLE genes: Setting boundaries in development and defense
Abstract
BLADE-ON-PETIOLE (BOP) genes encode an ancient and conserved subclade of BTB-ankryin transcriptional co-activators, divergent in the NPR1 family of plant defense regulators. Arabidopsis BOP1/2 were originally characterized as regulators of leaf and floral patterning. Recent investigation of BOP activity in a variety of land plants provides a more complete picture of their conserved functions at lateral organ boundaries in the determination of leaf, flower, inflorescence, and root nodule architecture. BOPs exert their function in part through promotion of lateral organ boundary genes including ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2, KNOTTED1-LIKE FROM ARABIDOPSIS6, and ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX GENE1 whose products restrict growth, promote differentiation, and antagonize meristem activity in various developmental contexts. Mutually antagonistic interactions between BOP and meristem factors are important in maintaining a border between meristem-organ compartments and in controlling irreversible transitions in cell fate associated with differentiation. We also examine intriguing new evidence for BOP function in plant defense. Comparisons to NPR1 highlight previously unexplored mechanisms for co-ordination of development and defense in land plants.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is no evidence that CUC gene expression is altered in the bop1 bop2 double mutant, suggesting BOP1/2 are not playing a role in the initial establishment of boundary domains.
“There is no evidence that CUC gene expression is altered in the bop1 bop2 double mutant, suggesting that BOP1/2 are not playing a role in the initial establishment of boundary domains (Khan et al., 2014).”
From <i>Divide et impera</i>: boundaries shape the plant body and initiate new meristems (2016) · cites this paper as Khan et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 170 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Khan, M., Xu, H., & Hepworth, S. R.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hepworth, Shelley R.
- Venue
- Plant Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 215-216
- Pages
- 157-171
- ISSN
- 0168-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074194451
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 170
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plant Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- NSERC Discovery Grant
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- plant development, plant defense, ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2, cell fate determination, NPR1, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Genes, Plant, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Meristem, Arabidopsis Proteins, Disease Resistance, Plant Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review