Evaluation of suitable reference genes for normalization of microRNA expression by real-time reverse transcription PCR analysis during longan somatic embryogenesis
Abstract
Accurate profiling of microRNAs (miRNAs) is an essential step for understanding both developmental and physiological functions of miRNAs. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) is being widely used in miRNA expression studies, but choosing a suitable reference gene is a crucial factor for correct analysis of results. To date, there has been no systematic evaluation of qPCR reference genes for the study of miRNAs during somatic embryogenesis (SE) in the longan tree (Dimocarpus longan). Here, the most stably expressed miRNAs in synchronized longan tree embryogenic cultures at different developmental stages were determined using the geNorm and NormFinder algorithms. Validation qPCR experiments were performed for 24 miRNAs together with a snRNA (U6 snRNA), a rRNA (5S rRNA), and three housekeeping genes. It was found that small RNAs had better expression stability than protein-coding genes, and dlo-miR24 was identified as the most reliable reference gene, followed by dlo-miR168a*, dlo-miR2089*-1 and 5S rRNA. dlo-miR24 was recommended as a normalizer if only a single reference gene was to be used, while the combination of dlo-miR156c, dlo-2089*-1 and 5S rRNA was preferred to normalize miRNA expression data during longan SE.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a persistent challenge of normalization in miRNA expression studies across cell types and tissues.
“There is a persistent challenge of normalization in miRNA expression studies across cell types and tissues [43–47].”
From Expression of miR-15/107 Family MicroRNAs in Human Tissues and Cultured Rat Brain Cells (2014) · cites this paper as [44]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Expression of miR-15/107 Family MicroRNAs in Human Tissues and Cultured Rat Brain Cells
Wang, W.-X., Danaher, R. J., Miller, C. S., Berger, J. R., Nubia, V. G., Wilfred, B. S., Neltner, J. H., Norris, C. M., & Nelson, P. T. (2014) · Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics · doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2013.10.003 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lin, Y. L., & Lai, Z. X.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 66
- Pages
- 20-25
- ISSN
- 0981-9428
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31078717, 31272149 and 31201614)
- Doctoral Program of Higher Education of the Chinese Ministry of Education (20093515110005 and 20123515120008)
- Fujian Provincial Scientific & Technological Platform (2008N2001)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review