The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase
Abstract
Plant growth and productivity is negatively affected by soil salinity. However, it is predicted that plant growth-promoting bacterial (PGPB) endophytes that contain 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase (E.C. 4.1.99.4) can facilitate plant growth and development in the presence of a number of different stresses. In present study, the ability of ACC deaminase containing PGPB endophytes Pseudomonas fluorescens YsS6, Pseudomonas migulae 8R6, and their ACC deaminase deficient mutants to promote tomato plant growth in the absence of salt and under two different levels of salt stress (165 mM and 185 mM) was assessed. It was evidence that wild-type bacterial endophytes (P. fluorescens YsS6 and P. migulae 8R6) promoted tomato plant growth significantly even in the absence of stress (salinity). Plants pretreated with wild-type ACC deaminase containing endophytic strains were healthier and grew to a much larger size under high salinity stress compared to plants pretreated with the ACC deaminase deficient mutants or no bacterial treatment (control). The plants pretreated with ACC deaminase containing bacterial endophytes exhibit higher fresh and dry biomass, higher chlorophyll contents, and a greater number of flowers and buds than the other treatments. Since the only difference between wild-type and mutant bacterial endophytes was ACC deaminase activity, it is concluded that this enzyme is directly responsible for the different behavior of tomato plants in response to salt stress. The use of PGPB endophytes with ACC deaminase activity has the potential to facilitate plant growth on land that is not normally suitable for the majority of crops due to their high salt contents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Self-citationA model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting bacteria
Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M., & Li, J. (1998) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.1997.0532 · Cited by 1,466
Self-citation
Cited by
Biochar Amendment Improves Crop Production in Problem Soils: A Review
Yu, H., Zou, W., Chen, J., Chen, H., Yu, Z., Huang, J., Tang, H., Wei, X., & Gao, B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.117 · Cited by 675
Shahzad, R., Khan, A. L., Bilal, S., Waqas, M., Kang, S.-M., & Lee, I.-J. (2017) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.01.010 · Cited by 367
Su, F., Zhao, B., Dhondt-Cordelier, S., & Vaillant-Gaveau, N. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25031465 · Cited by 68
Perspectives of Rhizobacteria with ACC Deaminase Activity in Plant Growth Under Abiotic Stress
Raghuwanshi, R., & Prasad, J. K. (2018) · Soil Biology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75910-4_12 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Ali, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 160-167
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009560230
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003
- The paper
- Ali, S., Charles, T. C., & Glick, B. R. (2014). Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.