The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Alleviation of drought stress in grapevine by foliar-applied strigolactones
Abstract
Drought is one of the major abiotic stress factors that affect grape growth and yield, which in turn negatively affects the grape and wine production industry. Developing effective approaches to improve grapevine tolerance to drought stress is a priority for viticulture. Strigolactones, a newly discovered class of carotenoid-derived phytohormones, have been found to participate in various physiological processes. Herein, the effect of strigolactones (SLs) on grape seedlings under drought stress was investigated. Two-year-old grape seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.) were sprayed with 3 doses of rac-GR24 (1 μM, 3 μM and 5 μM), a synthesized strigolactone, and then were subjected to 7% (w/v) polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000) to simulate the drought conditions. Synthetic GR24 treated plants showed higher tolerance to drought stress with regard to lower electrolyte leakage, stomatal opening, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and higher relative water content, chlorophyll content, photosynthesis rate and malondialdehyde (MDA) content. GR24 application also decreased the levels of indoleacetic acid (IAA) and zeatin riboside (ZR), while increasing the level of abscisic acid (ABA), both in the roots and leaves under drought stress. These results suggested that foliar application of GR24 could ameliorate the adverse effects of drought due to its regulation of stomatal closure through ABA or ROS, and modulation of chlorophyll components and photosynthesis, as well as activation of the antioxidant defense capacity. Cross-talk with other hormones, especially ABA, was also suggested to be one of the important mechanism during this process. This study contributes to our current understanding of GR24-induced drought tolerance in grapevines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching
Gomez-Roldan, V., Fermas, S., Brewer, P. B., Puech-Pagès, V., Dun, E. A., Pillot, J.-P., Letisse, F., Matusova, R., Danoun, S., Portais, J.-C., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07271 · Cited by 2,281
Inhibition of shoot branching by new terpenoid plant hormones
Umehara, M., Hanada, A., Yoshida, S., Akiyama, K., Arite, T., Takeda-Kamiya, N., Magome, H., Kamiya, Y., Shirasu, K., Yoneyama, K., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07272 · Cited by 2,105
Cited by
Smart reprograming of plants against salinity stress using modern biotechnological tools
Raza, A., Tabassum, J., Fakhar, A. Z., Sharif, R., Chen, H., Zhang, C., Ju, L., Fotopoulos, V., Siddique, K. H. M., Singh, R. K., et al. (2023) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2093695 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, Z., Li, R., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Liu, M., Ju, Y., & Fang, Y.
- Venue
- Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 99-110
- ISSN
- 0981-9428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901992052
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alleviation of drought stress in grapevine by foliar-applied strigolactones. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.037
- The paper
- Min, Z., Li, R., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Liu, M., Ju, Y., & Fang, Y. (2019). Alleviation of drought stress in grapevine by foliar-applied strigolactones. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.