The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coupled disease–behavior dynamics on complex networks: A review
Open accessAbstract
It is increasingly recognized that a key component of successful infection control efforts is understanding the complex, two-way interaction between disease dynamics and human behavioral and social dynamics. Human behavior such as contact precautions and social distancing clearly influence disease prevalence, but disease prevalence can in turn alter human behavior, forming a coupled, nonlinear system. Moreover, in many cases, the spatial structure of the population cannot be ignored, such that social and behavioral processes and/or transmission of infection must be represented with complex networks. Research on studying coupled disease–behavior dynamics in complex networks in particular is growing rapidly, and frequently makes use of analysis methods and concepts from statistical physics. Here, we review some of the growing literature in this area. We contrast network-based approaches to homogeneous-mixing approaches, point out how their predictions differ, and describe the rich and often surprising behavior of disease–behavior dynamics on complex networks, and compare them to processes in statistical physics. We discuss how these models can capture the dynamics that characterize many real-world scenarios, thereby suggesting ways that policy makers can better design effective prevention strategies. We also describe the growing sources of digital data that are facilitating research in this area. Finally, we suggest pitfalls which might be faced by researchers in the field, and we suggest several ways in which the field could move forward in the coming years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
Social Contacts and Mixing Patterns Relevant to the Spread of Infectious Diseases
Mossong, J., Hens, N., Jit, M., Beutels, P., Auranen, K., Mikolajczyk, R., Massari, M., Salmaso, S., Tomba, G. S., Wallinga, J., et al. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074 · Cited by 2,900
Holme, P., & Saramäki, J. (2012) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001 · Cited by 2,736 · cited 2×
“Time-varying networks (also named temporal networks) provide another framework for the activity-driven changing of connection topology [31, 123, 32] .”
BackgroundGlobally networked risks and how to respond
Helbing, D. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12047 · Cited by 1,281
Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic
Hatchett, R. J., Mecher, C. E., & Lipsitch, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610941104 · Cited by 778 · cited 1×
“Incorporating adaptive behavior into a model of disease spread can provide important insight into population health outcomes, as the activation of social distancing and other nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been observed to have the ability to alter the course of an epidemic [50] [51] [52] .”
BackgroundActivity driven modeling of time varying networks
Perra, N., Gonçalves, B., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Vespignani, A. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00469 · Cited by 709
Network theory and SARS: predicting outbreak diversity
Meyers, L. A., Pourbohloul, B., Newman, M. E. J., Skowronski, D. M., & Brunham, R. C. (2005) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.07.026 · Cited by 705
Modeling Users' Activity on Twitter Networks: Validation of Dunbar's Number
Gonçalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022656 · Cited by 638
Dynamics and Control of Diseases in Networks with Community Structure
Salathé, M., & Jones, J. H. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000736 · Cited by 586
Salathé, M., & Khandelwal, S. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002199 · Cited by 530
Cited by
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Self-citationThe physics of spreading processes in multilayer networks
De Domenico, M., Granell, C., Porter, M. A., & Arenas, A. (2016) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3865 · Cited by 649
The multilayer nature of ecological networks
Pilosof, S., Porter, M. A., Pascual, M., & Kéfi, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0101 · Cited by 574
Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010–2015)
Verelst, F., Willem, L., & Beutels, P. (2016) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2016.0820 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Andrews, M. A., Wu, Z.-X., Wang, L., & Bauch, C. T.
- Venue
- Physics of Life Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 1571-0645 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2192780418
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 37.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coupled disease–behavior dynamics on complex networks: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.07.006
- The paper
- Wang, Z., Andrews, M. A., Wu, Z.-X., Wang, L., & Bauch, C. T. (2015). Coupled disease–behavior dynamics on complex networks: A review. Physics of Life Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.07.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.