Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 174 of the 174 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The strength and stiffness of oriented wood and cellulose-fibre materials: A review

Open access
Jakob, Matthias, Mahendran, Arunjunai Raj, Gindl-Altmutter, Wolfgang, Bliem, Peter, Konnerth, Johannes, Müller, Ulrich, Veigel, Stefan·2022·Progress in Materials Science

Abstract

In recent times, a clear trend towards the use of biobased materials can be seen in many areas. Apart from beneficial ecological properties, high strength and stiffness at low weight are desirable in structural applications, a combination typically offered by cellulose-based materials. As an adaption to mechanical stresses acting on the living organism, most biobased fibre materials inherently show anisotropic mechanical properties and feature a preferred orientation of high-strength cellulose fibres. In both nature and engineering, unidirectional fibre orientation might be beneficial since only this arrangement fully exploits the high strength and stiffness of the cellulose biopolymer. The present paper is a selective review of cellulose-based fibre materials with either unidirectional or close-to unidirectional orientation. This includes, amongst others, materials derived from wood or bamboo, natural fibre composites, all-cellulose composites and nanocellulose-based materials. This review shall serve as an indicator of the strength potential inherent to biobased cellulosic materials in order to ascertain their suitability for potential applications. Each type of material is described in terms of structure and corresponding representative values for strength and modulus of elasticity in fibre direction. Finally, a concise comparison of individual fibre and bulk materials in terms of mechanical performance is provided.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100916

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 174 references

Metadata

Authors
Jakob, M., Mahendran, A. R., Gindl-Altmutter, W., Bliem, P., Konnerth, J., Müller, U., & Veigel, S.
Venue
Progress in Materials Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
125
Pages
100916
ISSN
0079-6425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200162628
Cited by
292
References
174
FWCI
12.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The strength and stiffness of oriented wood and cellulose-fibre materials: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100916
The paper
Jakob, M., Mahendran, A. R., Gindl-Altmutter, W., Bliem, P., Konnerth, J., Müller, U., & Veigel, S. (2022). The strength and stiffness of oriented wood and cellulose-fibre materials: A review. Progress in Materials Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.