Cited by 268Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Statins: Mechanisms of neuroprotection

van der Most, Peter J., Dolga, Amalia M., Nijholt, Ingrid M., Luiten, Paul G.M., Eisel, Ulrich L.M.·2009·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Clinical trials report that the class of drugs known as statins may be neuroprotective in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, and further trials are currently underway to test whether these drugs are also beneficial in multiple sclerosis and acute stroke treatment. Since statins are well tolerated and have relatively few side effects, they may be considered as viable drugs to ameliorate neurodegenerative diseases. However, the mechanism of their neuroprotective effects is only partly understood. In this article, we review the current data on the neuroprotective effects of statins and their underlying mechanisms. In the first section, we detail the mechanisms by which statins affect cellular signalling. The primary action of statins is to inhibit cellular cholesterol synthesis. However, the cholesterol synthesis pathway also has several by-products, the non-sterol isoprenoids that are also important in cellular functioning. Furthermore, reduced cholesterol levels may deplete the cholesterol-rich membrane domains known as lipid rafts, which in turn could affect cellular signalling. In the second section, we summarize how the effects on signalling translate into general neuroprotective effects through peripheral systems. Statins improve blood-flow, reduce coagulation, modulate the immune system and reduce oxidative damage. The final section deals with the effects of statins on the central nervous system, particularly during Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, stroke and multip…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.02.002

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Most, P. J., Dolga, A. M., Nijholt, I. M., Luiten, P. G. M., & Eisel, U. L. M.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Eisel, Ulrich L.M.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-05
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
64-75
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157236444
Cited by
268
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
statins, neuroprotection, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, acute stroke, cholesterol synthesis inhibition, lipid rafts, signal transduction, neurodegenerative diseases, cerebral blood flow, coagulation, immunomodulation, oxidative damage
MeSH terms
Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Neuroprotective Agents, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Neurodegenerative Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review