Cited by 296Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Role of dopamine receptor mechanisms in the amygdaloid modulation of fear and anxiety: Structural and functional analysis

de la Mora, Miguel Pérez, Gallegos-Cari, Andrea, Arizmendi-García, Yexel, Marcellino, Daniel, Fuxe, Kjell·2010·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

Dopamine plays an important role in fear and anxiety modulating a cortical brake that the medial prefrontal cortex exerts on the anxiogenic output of the amygdala and have an important influence on the trafficking of impulses between the basolateral (BLA) and central nuclei (CeA) of amygdala. Dopamine afferents from the ventral tegmental area innervate preferentially the rostrolateral main and paracapsular intercalated islands as well as the lateral central nucleus of amygdala activating non-overlapping populations of D1- and D2-dopamine receptors located in these structures. Behaviorally, the intra-amygdaloid infusion of D1 agonists and antagonists elicits anxiogenic and anxiolytic effects respectively on conditioned and non-conditioned models of fear/anxiety suggesting an anxiogenic role for D1 receptors in amygdala. The analysis of the effects of D2 agonists and antagonists suggest that depending of the nature of the threat the animal experiences in anxiety models either anxiogenic or anxiolytic effects are elicited. It is suggested that D1- and D2-dopamine receptors in the amygdala may have a differential role in the modulation of anxiety. The possibility is discussed that D1 receptors participate in danger recognition facilitating conditioned-unconditioned associations by the retrieval of the affective properties of the unconditioned stimuli, and in the control of impulse trafficking from cortical and BLA regions to BLA and CeA nuclei respectively whereas D2 receptors have a role in setting up adaptive responses to cope with aversive environmental stimuli.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.10.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 311 · Cited by 296

Authors
de la Mora, M. P., Gallegos-Cari, A., Arizmendi-García, Y., Marcellino, D., & Fuxe, K.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
90
Issue
2
Pages
198-216
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985871295
Cited by
296
References
311
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 26
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
dopamine receptors, dopamine D1 receptor, dopamine D2 receptor, amygdala, fear, anxiety, basolateral amygdala, central amygdala, ventral tegmental area, medial prefrontal cortex, anxiogenic effects, anxiolytic effects, fear conditioning, threat detection
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Disease Models, Animal, Fear, Humans, Receptors, Dopamine, Structure-Activity Relationship, Dopamine Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review