Brain mechanisms for perceptual and reward-related decision-making
Open accessAbstract
Phenomenological models of decision-making, including the drift-diffusion and race models, are compared with mechanistic, biologically plausible models, such as integrate-and-fire attractor neuronal network models. The attractor network models show how decision confidence is an emergent property; and make testable predictions about the neural processes (including neuronal activity and fMRI signals) involved in decision-making which indicate that the medial prefrontal cortex is involved in reward value-based decision-making. Synaptic facilitation in these models can help to account for sequential vibrotactile decision-making, and for how postponed decision-related responses are made. The randomness in the neuronal spiking-related noise that makes the decision-making probabilistic is shown to be increased by the graded firing rate representations found in the brain, to be decreased by the diluted connectivity, and still to be significant in biologically large networks with thousands of synapses onto each neuron. The stability of these systems is shown to be influenced in different ways by glutamatergic and GABAergic efficacy, leading to a new field of dynamical neuropsychiatry with applications to understanding schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The noise in these systems is shown to be advantageous, and to apply to similar attractor networks involved in short-term memory, long-term memory, attention, and associative thought processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decision variables are applied simultaneously, and the network, after previous training with these decision variables, reaches a state where the population of neurons representing one of the decision variables has a high firing rate.
“The decision variables are applied simultaneously, and the network, after previous training with these decision variables, reaches a state where the population of neurons representing one of the decision variables has a high firing rate (Rolls and Deco, 2010; Deco et al., 2013; Rolls, 2016b; 2021a).”
From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Deco et al., 2013
Attractor networks in the orbitofrontal cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex provide the basis for reward-related decision-making, in which inputs to two competing attractor states lead to a bifurcation and to a decision.
“These attractor networks in the OFC and ventromedial prefrontal cortex also provide the basis for reward-related decision-making, in which inputs to two competing attractor states in an attractor network lead to a bifurcation and to a decision (Rolls and Deco, 2010; Rolls et al., 2010a,b, Deco et al., 2013; Rolls, 2021a).”
From The orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression (2020) · cites this paper as Deco et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 124 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Deco, G., Rolls, E. T., Albantakis, L., & Romo, R.
- Affiliations
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- Oxford Centre for Computational Neuroscience (GB)
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Rolls, Edmund T.
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 103
- Pages
- 194-213
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104040519
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- decision-making, attractor networks, integrate-and-fire neurons, drift-diffusion model, race model, decision confidence, medial prefrontal cortex, reward-based decision-making, neural noise, synaptic facilitation, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, short-term memory, long-term memory, attention, probabilistic decision making
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Decision Making, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Perception, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review