CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 126Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 282 of the 283 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Brain areas that influence general anesthesia

Leung, L. Stan, Luo, Tao, Ma, Jingyi, Herrick, Ian·2014·Progress in Neurobiology
DOI 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.08.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This document reviews the literature on local brain manipulation of general anesthesia in animals, focusing on behavioral and electrographic effects related to hypnosis or loss of consciousness. Local inactivation or lesion of wake-active areas, such as locus coeruleus, dorsal raphe, pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus, perifornical area, tuberomammillary nucleus, ventral tegmental area and basal forebrain, enhanced general anesthesia. Anesthesia enhancement was shown as a delayed emergence (recovery of righting reflex) from anesthesia or a decrease in the minimal alveolar concentration that induced loss of righting. Local activation of various wake-active areas, including pontis oralis and centromedial thalamus, promoted behavioral or electrographic arousal during maintained anesthesia and facilitated emergence. Lesion of the sleep-active ventrolateral preoptic area resulted in increased wakefulness and decreased isoflurane sensitivity, but only for 6 days after lesion. Inactivation of any structure within limbic circuits involving the medial septum, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, and ventral tegmental area, amygdala, entorhinal and piriform cortex delayed emergence from anesthesia, and often reduced anesthetic-induced behavioral excitation. In summary, the concept that anesthesia works on the sleep-wake system has received strong support from studies that inactivated/lesioned or activated wake-active areas, and weak support from studies that lesioned sleep-active areas. In addition to the conventional wake-sleep areas, limbic structures such as the medial septum, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are also involved in the behavioral response to general anesthesia. We suggest that hypnosis during general anesthesia may result from disrupting the wake-active neuronal activities in multiple areas and suppressing an atropine-resistant cortical activation associated with movements.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.08.001

Cites

282 of 282 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 283 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ma, 2003, Forebrain structures that participate in general anesthesia, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 29, 384.7
  2. Mogenson, 1993, From motivation to action: a review of dopaminergic regulation of limbic–nucleus accumbens–ventral pallidum–pedunculopontine nucleus circuits involved in limbic–motor integration, 193
  3. Vertes, 1997, Brainstem-diencephalo-septohippocampal systems controlling the theta rhythm of the hippocampus, Neuroscience, 81, 893

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Related

Metadata

Authors
Leung, L. S., Luo, T., Ma, J., & Herrick, I.
Affiliations
  • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (CN)
  • Western University (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
122
Pages
24-44
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.08.001
OpenAlex
W2001908985
Cited by
126
References
283
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
general anesthesia, emergence from anesthesia, locus coeruleus, dorsal raphe nucleus, pedunculopontine nucleus, perifornical area, tuberomammillary nucleus, ventral tegmental area, basal forebrain, ventrolateral preoptic area, limbic system, medial septum, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, amygdala, prefrontal cortex, anesthetic sensitivity, isoflurane, loss of consciousness, hypnosis, righting reflex, lesion studies, brain activation
MeSH terms
Anesthesia, General, Animals, Brain, Humans, Sleep, Wakefulness, Anesthetics, General

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review