Cited by 220Memory and Neural MechanismsEmbodied and Extended CognitionMemory Processes and Influences

Prediction and memory: A predictive coding account

Open access
Barron, Helen C., Auksztulewicz, Ryszard, Friston, Karl·2020·Progress in Neurobiology

Abstract

The hippocampus is crucial for episodic memory, but it is also involved in online prediction. Evidence suggests that a unitary hippocampal code underlies both episodic memory and predictive processing, yet within a predictive coding framework the hippocampal-neocortical interactions that accompany these two phenomena are distinct and opposing. Namely, during episodic recall, the hippocampus is thought to exert an excitatory influence on the neocortex, to reinstate activity patterns across cortical circuits. This contrasts with empirical and theoretical work on predictive processing, where descending predictions suppress prediction errors to 'explain away' ascending inputs via cortical inhibition. In this hypothesis piece, we attempt to dissolve this previously overlooked dialectic. We consider how the hippocampus may facilitate both prediction and memory, respectively, by inhibiting neocortical prediction errors or increasing their gain. We propose that these distinct processing modes depend upon the neuromodulatory gain (or precision) ascribed to prediction error units. Within this framework, memory recall is cast as arising from fictive prediction errors that furnish training signals to optimise generative models of the world, in the absence of sensory data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101821

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hippocampus includes cholinergic regulation of superficial pyramidal cells.

    “The hippocampus, which is involved early in the course of AD, includes cholinergic regulation of superficial pyramidal cells. 8”

    From Alzheimer's disease and its progression reduce pyramidal cell gain and connectivity (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction’s “Differential processing modes” section proposes that acetylcholine modulates the effects of hippocampal projections on cortical microcircuits. The “Inhibition versus disinhibition” section places the superficial pyramidal cells in neocortex, not in the hippocampus. The source therefore supports cholinergic modulation of hippocampal–neocortical interactions, but not the claim that the hippocampus itself includes cholinergic regulation of superficial pyramidal cells. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The hippocampus, affected early in AD, may modulate the precision of prediction errors with cholinergic regulation of regions at the top of the cortical hierarchy.

    “The hippocampus, affected early in the course of AD, may modulate the precision of prediction errors with cholinergic regulation of regions at the top of the cortical hierarchy (Figure 3 of Barron et al. 8 ).”

    From Alzheimer's disease and its progression reduce pyramidal cell gain and connectivity (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction section on neuromodulation and precision proposes that hippocampal regulation of acetylcholine may control the precision of cortical prediction errors; its discussion of Figure 3 supports that mechanism. Our copy does not address the added assertion that the hippocampus is affected early in Alzheimer’s disease. Page numbers were not available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 198 · Cited by 220

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Heuer H. Keele S.W. Handbook of Perception and Action: Motor Skills 1996 Academic Press

Authors
Barron, H. C., Auksztulewicz, R., & Friston, K.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Barron, Helen C.
Venue
Progress in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
192
Pages
101821
ISSN
0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027231994
Cited by
220
References
198
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 4
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neurobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
hippocampus, episodic memory, predictive coding, predictive processing, prediction error, hippocampal-neocortical interaction, memory retrieval, precision, generative models, cortical inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Humans, Interneurons, Models, Biological, Mental Recall, Neocortex, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review