Cited by 91Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

High-resolution magic angle spinning (HR MAS) MR spectroscopy in metabolic characterization of human cancer

Sitter, Beathe, Bathen, Tone F., Tessem, May-Britt, Gribbestad, Ingrid S.·2009·Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2008.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 105 · Cited by 91

Authors
Sitter, B., Bathen, T. F., Tessem, M.-B., & Gribbestad, I. S.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Sitter, Beathe
Venue
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
54
Issue
3-4
Pages
239-254
ISSN
0079-6565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052924277
Cited by
91
References
105
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
high-resolution magic angle spinning, cancer metabolism, human cancer, cancer metabolomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review