Cited by 158Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Perspectives for the development of animal models of bipolar disorder

Machado-Vieira, Rodrigo, Kapczinski, Flavio, Soares, Jair C·2004·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BD) has been a particularly challenging illness for the development of adequate animal models for neurobiological studies. These difficulties are largely related to the peculiar clinical characteristics of this illness, with an intriguing alternation of mania, depression, euthymia, and mixed states. The etiology and brain mechanisms involved in this several mental illness remain unknown. Preclinical studies with animal models of mania or depression have been developed to evaluate the potential efficacy of new psychotropic drugs and generate information concerning the biochemical effects of these drugs on specific targets. These models try to mimic the behavioral components of mania and depression in human subjects and examine the pharmacological responses and mechanisms of action of potentially new therapeutic agents. The main limitation is that there is currently no model that would mimic mood cyclicity, which is a hallmark feature of BD. Thus, these models do not represent valid paradigms for the study of this illness, because they do not address key questions regarding cyclicity. In this review, we propose that new genetics approaches involving potential animal models of BD are a promising new area for further development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.10.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a paucity of animal studies of bipolar disorder mainly because there are no animal models that satisfy the validity criteria for modeling this complex multifactorial disorder.

    “There is a paucity of animal studies of BD mainly because there are no animal models that satisfy the validity criteria for modeling this complex multifactorial disorder130–133.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [130]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 250 · Cited by 158

Authors
Machado-Vieira, R., Kapczinski, F., & Soares, J. C.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
209-224
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162602904
Cited by
158
References
250
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH001736, MH01736)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
bipolar disorder, animal models, mania, depression, mixed states, psychotropic drugs, drug mechanisms of action, preclinical models
MeSH terms
Animals, Bipolar Disorder, Depression, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Psychopharmacology, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review