The perfect time to be stressed: A differential modulation of human memory by stress applied in the morning or in the afternoon
Abstract
We measured the effects of a stressful experience on memory for emotionally arousing and neutral material learned after exposure to a stressor which induces a significant increase in corticosteroid stress hormones. Because memory performance can be influenced by circadian changes in corticosteroid levels, subjects were tested either in the morning or in the afternoon. Nineteen healthy men (9 in the morning group and 10 in the afternoon group) were submitted to a psychological stress task before viewing a story composed of emotionally negative and neutral segments, while another 20 healthy males (10 in the morning group and 10 in the afternoon group) viewed the story without being exposed to the psychological stressor. Salivary cortisol levels were measured before and after the stressor. Memory performance was assessed by a one week post learning delayed recall. Results show that stress-induced increases in salivary cortisol levels impaired delayed free recall of emotionally arousing material in the morning group, but not in the afternoon group. There was no effect of stress on memory for neutral material. Altogether, these findings suggest that stressing participants in the morning, at a time of high circulating levels of corticosteroids, over stimulated the corticosteroid receptors in the brain, impairing declarative memory for emotionally arousing material unrelated to the stressor. These findings suggest that the experimental context, i.e., time of day at which the experiment occurs, the nature of the to-be-remembered material (remembering the stressful event itself or material unrelated to the stressor) and the valence of the to-be-remembered material (emotionally arousing vs. neutral), modulates the effects of stress on human declarative memory.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stress hormones change throughout the day.
“because stress hormones change throughout the day (e.g., Maheu et al., 2005)”
From The effects of acute stress on eyewitness memory: An integrative review for eyewitness researchers (2021) · cites this paper as Maheu et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Maheu, F. S., Collicutt, P., Kornik, R., Moszkowski, R., & Lupien, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Lupien, Sonia J.
- ORCID
- Lupien, Sonia J.
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1281-1288
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987999022
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- stress, memory, circadian rhythm, salivary cortisol, emotional arousal, declarative memory, delayed recall, time of day, emotional valence, stress-induced memory impairment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Circadian Rhythm, Emotions, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Memory, Saliva, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review