Atypical antipsychotics in bipolar depression: Neurobiological basis and clinical implications
Abstract
The use of atypical antipsychotics is rapidly expanding in the management of bipolar disorder. This therapeutic class appears to have benefits across the spectrum of moods found in bipolar disorder, and a re-examination of the monoamine hypothesis is required. This paper reviews the evidence for the role of monoamines, and particularly dopamine, in bipolar depression and its implications in the treatment of patients, focusing upon the response to atypical antipsychotics. Relevant papers were identified undertaking a literature search using PubMed: preclinical and clinical studies that incriminate the dopaminergic system in bipolar depression, and recent controlled trials supporting the use of atypical antipsychotics, are reviewed. There is substantial evidence indicating that not only serotonin, but also dopamine may still play an important role as a mediator of antidepressant response in bipolar depression. A regionally selective balance between the dopamine and serotonin systems may account for the mood-stabilizing properties of these drugs, and in fact, a low D(2) occupancy might be more relevant to bipolar depression than greater 5-HT(2) action. This mechanism might correlate with the ability to induce neurogenetic effects. Hence, the greater the atypical profile, the more suitable for bipolar depression. Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Atypical antipsychotics are generally classified as a class despite marked differences in pharmacodynamic properties.
“Moreover, atypical antipsychotics, are generally classified as a class, despite their marked differences in pharmacodynamic properties”
From Efficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis (2010) · cites this paper as Brugue & Vieta, 2007
Based on data from latest studies and RCTs in bipolar depression, atypical antipsychotics do not seem to induce depressive episodes as anti-manic agents.
“Based on data from the latest studies and RCTs conducted in bipolar depression, atypical antipsychotics do not seem to induce depressive episodes as anti-manic agents”
From Efficacy of modern antipsychotics in placebo-controlled trials in bipolar depression: a meta-analysis (2010) · cites this paper as Brugue & Vieta, 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 85 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Brugue, E., & Vieta, E.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Vieta, Eduard
- ORCID
- Vieta, Eduard
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 275-282
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092091703
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Keywords
- atypical antipsychotics, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, dopamine, serotonin, monoamine hypothesis, dopamine D2 receptor occupancy, 5-HT2 receptor, antidepressant response, mood stabilization, neurogenesis
- MeSH terms
- Bipolar Disorder, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depression, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents, Biogenic Monoamines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review