Cited by 25Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomes

A multilevel analysis of the influence of Apolipoprotein E genotypes on depressive symptoms in late-life moderated by the environment

Yen, Yung-Chieh, Rebok, George W., Yang, Ming-Jen, Lung, For-Wey·2008·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to clarify the relationship between the APOE alleles and depressive symptoms of older adults, considering individual characteristics and the effect of neighborhood environment. Methods Using a multilevel, stratified sampling strategy, 500 elders were recruited from official household records. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire [TDQ]. Cognitive function was assessed by the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire [SPMSQ]. Blood samples were collected for the determination of the Apolipoprotein E [APOE] polymorphism. Perceived neighborhood experience was brought together using the Neighborhood Quality Index [NQI]. Results Three hundred and three subjects (58.8% male, with a mean age of 69.2 [SD=2.7] years) completed all questionnaires and the collection of blood samples. Risk factors for depressive symptoms of elders included lower educational level, cognitive impairment, having 2 or more chronic diseases, and having the APOE epsilon4 allele. In the 2-level model with individual characteristics and neighborhood environmental factors, the effect of the APOE epsilon4 allele on depressive symptoms was significantly attenuated. Conclusions The APOE epsilon4 allele is correlated with depressive symptoms among older adults, but moderated by neighborhood environmental factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.09.023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yen, Y.-C., Rebok, G. W., Yang, M.-J., & Lung, F.-W.
Affiliations
  • E-Da Hospital (TW)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lung, For-Wey
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
479-486
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019182288
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, depressive symptoms, geriatric depression, older adults, neighborhood environment, moderated effects, cognitive impairment, chronic disease, educational attainment, genetic risk factors
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Gene Frequency, Genotype, Health Status, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Residence Characteristics, Risk Factors, Social Environment, Taiwan, Geriatric Assessment, Comorbidity, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review