Cited by 333Treatment of Major DepressionTryptophan and brain disordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Beyond the serotonin hypothesis: Mitochondria, inflammation and neurodegeneration in major depression and affective spectrum disorders

Gardner, Ann, Boles, Richard G.·2011·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

For many years, a deficiency of monoamines including serotonin has been the prevailing hypothesis on depression, yet research has failed to confirm consistent relations between brain serotonin and depression. High degrees of overlapping comorbidities and common drug efficacies suggest that depression is one of a family of related conditions sometimes referred to as the "affective spectrum disorders", and variably including migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia and generalized anxiety disorder, among many others. Herein, we present data from many different experimental modalities that strongly suggest components of mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation in the pathogenesis of depression and other affective spectrum disorders. The three concepts of monoamines, energy metabolism and inflammatory pathways are inter-related in many complex manners. For example, the major categories of drugs used to treat depression have been demonstrated to exert effects on mitochondria and inflammation, as well as on monoamines. Furthermore, commonly-used mitochondrial-targeted treatments exert effects on mitochondria and inflammation, and are increasingly being shown to demonstrate efficacy in the affective spectrum disorders. We propose that interactions among monoamines, mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation can inspire explanatory, rather than mere descriptive, models of these disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.07.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 238 · Cited by 333

Authors
Gardner, A., & Boles, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Ann
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
730-743
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127624653
Cited by
333
References
238
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 24
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
major depressive disorder, affective spectrum disorders, serotonin hypothesis, monoamines, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, energy metabolism, comorbidities, migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, generalized anxiety disorder, antidepressant mechanism, mitochondrial-targeted therapy, depression pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Major Depressive Disorder, Electroconvulsive Therapy, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Mitochondria, Nerve Degeneration, Serotonin, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Mood Disorders, Mitochondrial Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review