Deficits in sustaining reward responses in subsyndromal and syndromal major depression
Open accessAbstract
Preliminary findings suggest a reduction in capacity to sustain reward responses in major depression. However, relatively little is known about the stability of reward learning over time and the effect of stress on reward responses in depressed individuals. This study aimed to evaluate sustained behaviour to maximize reward in the context of known reinforcement contingencies and to evaluate the extent to which stress influences such behaviour in clinically depressed patients (n=43), subsyndromally depressed individuals (n=43), and healthy controls (n=44). A probabilistic reward learning task with contingencies known to participants was used to evaluate the change of reward response over time in both 'stress' and 'non-stress' conditions. Stress was induced by salient negative feedback during the task performance. Questionnaires capturing subjective affect were also administered to all participants after completion of the task. Response bias to the stimulus signaling greater reward decreased significantly over time in both subsyndromally and clinically depressed participants, but not in healthy controls. Healthy controls demonstrated a trend of dysfunctional reward processing under the stress condition. Moreover, in the stress condition, the deficit in sustaining behaviour to maximize reward was associated with subjective rating of pleasure in participants with either subsyndromal depression or major depression. These findings suggest that individuals with depression have difficulty sustaining behaviour during a known reinforcement schedule. Participants with anhedonic symptoms are even less likely to sustain behaviour to maximize reward under stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Depressed individuals view rewards, like money or social encouragement, as less motivating than individuals without depressive symptoms.
“Depressed individuals view rewards, like money or social encouragement, as less motivating than individuals without depressive symptoms [16-18].”
From Examining the effectiveness of gamification in mental health apps for depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Reward learning is impaired in MDD, and this impairment is correlated with the severity of anhedonic symptoms.
“Reward learning has also been found to be impaired in MDD [206], and this impairment is correlated with the severity of anhedonic symptoms [207].”
From Reward circuitry dysfunction in psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and genetic syndromes: animal models and clinical findings (2012) · cites this paper as [207]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Liu, W.-H., Chan, R. C. K., Wang, L.-Z., Huang, J., Cheung, E. F. C., Gong, Q.-Y., & Gollan, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital (CN)
- Castle Peak Hospital (CN)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Raymond C.K.
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1045-1052
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050511962
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ir.psych.ac.cn
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- major depressive disorder, subthreshold depression, reward processing, reward learning, stress, negative feedback, anhedonia, response bias, reward maximization, reinforcement contingencies
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Major Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Stress, Psychological, Signal Detection, Psychological, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review