The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Potential fly-ash utilization in agriculture: A global review
Open accessAbstract
Though in last four decades various alternate energy sources have come into the limelight, the hyperbolic use of coal as a prime energy source cannot be counterbalanced. Disposal of high amount of fly-ash from thermal power plants absorbs huge amount of water, energy and land area by ash ponds. In order to meet the growing energy demand, various environmental, economic and social problems associated with the disposal of fly-ash would continue to increase. Therefore, fly-ash management would remain a great concern of the century. Fly-ash has great potentiality in agriculture due to its efficacy in modification of soil health and crop performance. The high concentration of elements (K, Na, Zn, Ca, Mg and Fe) in fly-ash increases the yield of many agricultural crops. But compared to other sectors, the use of fly-ash in agriculture is limited. An exhaustive review of numerous studies of last four decades took place in this paper, which systematically covers the importance, scope and apprehension regarding utilization of fly-ash in agriculture. The authors concluded that though studies have established some solutions to handle the problems of radioactivity and heavy metal content in fly-ash, long-term confirmatory research and demonstration are necessary. This paper also identified some areas, like proper handling of dry ash in plants as well as in fields, ash pond management (i.e., faster decantation, recycling of water, vertical expansion rather than horizontal), monitoring of soil health, crop quality, and fate of fly-ash in time domain, where research thrust is required. Agricultural lime application contributes to global warming as Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assumes that all the carbon in agricultural lime is finally released as CO2 to the atmosphere. It is expected that use of fly-ash instead of lime in agriculture can reduce net CO2 emission, thus reduce global warming also.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash
Yao, Z. T., Ji, X. S., Sarker, P. K., Tang, J. H., Ge, L. Q., Xia, M. S., & Xi, Y. Q. (2015) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.016 · Cited by 1,737
Niu, Y., Tan, H., & Hui, S. (2016) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2015.09.003 · Cited by 1,069
Fly ash properties, characterization, and applications: A review
Alterary, S. S., & Marei, N. H. (2021) · Journal of King Saud University - Science · doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101536 · Cited by 365
Aromatic grasses for phytomanagement of coal fly ash hazards
Verma, S. K., Singh, K., Gupta, A. K., Pandey, V. C., Trivedi, P., Verma, R. K., & Patra, D. D. (2014) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.09.106 · Cited by 103
The use of wood biomass ash in sewage sludge treatment in terms of its agricultural utilization
Wójcik, M., Stachowicz, F., & Masłoń, A. (2020) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-018-0518-0 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Basu, M., Pande, M., Bhadoria, P. B. S., & Mahapatra, S. C.
- Venue
- Progress in Natural Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1173-1186
- ISSN
- 1002-0071 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025359571
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Potential fly-ash utilization in agriculture: A global review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.006
- The paper
- Basu, M., Pande, M., Bhadoria, P. B. S., & Mahapatra, S. C. (2009). Potential fly-ash utilization in agriculture: A global review. Progress in Natural Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.