Autism in Poland in comparison to other countries
Abstract
Introduction In recent years, it has been suggested that the increasing incidence of autism diagnosed in Poland highlights improved diagnostics as well as the recorded increase in morbidity. The precise number of individuals with autism in Poland has not been determined, and current sources are unable to provide unequivocal Polish data. Aim The aim of this study is to compare the epidemiology of autism-related disorders in Poland with other European countries and the United States. Material and methods Statistical data provided by the Polish National Health Fund Headquarters in June 2013 and data pooled from international journal articles were analyzed in detail. Results and discussion The National Health Fund reported that 13 261 individuals up to 18 years of age received health services for autism and related disorders in Poland in 2012. This is a prevalence rate of 3.4 cases per 10 000 individuals. Incidence rates vary in different Polish regions, with the highest rates recorded in the following voivodships: warmińsko-mazurskie (6.5 cases per 10 000 individuals), śląskie (5.0), and pomorskie (4.6). The provinces with lowest rates were podlaskie (2.1), małopolskie (1.9), zachodniopomorskie (1.9), and łódzkie (1.8). These rates are far lower than those in European countries (20 per 10 000) and United States (200 per 10 000) epidemiological surveys. Conclusions Information on the prevalence of autism in Poland and in the world remains unclear and imprecise. This results from global differences in diagnostic criteria. There is urgent need to develop global standards for the diagnosis of autism in children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Autism is under-reported in the Polish setting at 3.4 cases per 10,000 individuals, vastly lower than 200 cases per 10,000 in equivalent surveys in the United States.
“Autism is under-reported in the Polish setting at 3.4 cases per 10,000 individuals. This estimate is vastly lower compared to 200 cases per 10,000 individuals in equivalent surveys in the United States [18].”
From Remote work support needs of employees with autism spectrum disorder in Poland: perspectives of individuals with autism and their coworkers (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Middle-aged to older adults with autism in the workforce are likely to be undiagnosed since diagnostic services tend to serve children and younger adults.
“Middle-aged to older adults with autism in the workforce are likely to be undiagnosed since diagnostic services tend to serve children and younger adults [18].”
From Remote work support needs of employees with autism spectrum disorder in Poland: perspectives of individuals with autism and their coworkers (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Piskorz-Ogórek, K., Ogórek, S., Cieślińska, A., & Kostyra, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Kostyra, Elżbieta
- Venue
- Polish Annals of Medicine
- Publisher
- Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-40
- ISSN
- 1230-8013 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066976578
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polish Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, autism prevalence, autism incidence, Poland, regional variation in incidence, diagnostic criteria, cross-national comparison, National Health Fund
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review