Cited by 56Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsClimate variability and models

A model of the upper branch of the meridional overturning of the southern ocean

Marshall, John, Radko, Timour·2006·Progress in Oceanography

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.07.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Marshall, J., & Radko, T.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Marshall, John
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-08
Volume
70
Issue
2-4
Pages
331-345
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2168939336
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Office of Polar Programs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
meridional overturning circulation, Southern Ocean, Antarctic Circumpolar Current, potential vorticity, eddy forcing, wind forcing, buoyancy forcing, intermediate water, upwelling, subduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review