The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE
MORRIS, M. G., & VENKATESH, V. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00206.x · Cited by 1,723
Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts
Rice, R. E., & Katz, J. E. (2003) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/s0308-5961(03)00068-5 · Cited by 593
Cited by
The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015) · Communication and Information Technologies Annual · doi:10.1108/s2050-206020150000010002 · Cited by 1,022
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2015) · The Information Society · doi:10.1080/01972243.2015.1069770 · Cited by 353
Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816634676 · Cited by 332
Why Do They Refuse to Use My Robot?: Reasons for Non-Use Derived from a Long-Term Home Study
de Graaf, M., Ben Allouch, S., & van Dijk, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2909824.3020236 · Cited by 169
Exploring heterogeneous ICT use among older adults: The warm experts’ perspective
Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., & Luostari, R. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820917353 · Cited by 137
Metadata
- Authors
- Selwyn, N.
- Venue
- Poetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 273-292
- ISSN
- 0304-422X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071162947
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 41.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.003
- The paper
- Selwyn, N. (2006). Digital division or digital decision? A study of non-users and low-users of computers. Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2006.05.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.