Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 21Art History and Market AnalysisCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentContemporary art, education, critique

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market

O’Neil, Kathleen M.·2008·Poetics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.002

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moulin, Raymonde, 1987. The French Art Market: A Sociological View (Arthur Goldhammer, Trans.). Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
O’Neil, K. M.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
O’Neil, Kathleen M.
Venue
Poetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
94-113
ISSN
0304-422X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999231836
Cited by
21
References
51
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Poetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art History and Market Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Contemporary art, education, critique
Keywords
art pricing, visual artists, price setting, aesthetic value, market factors, demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.002
The paper
O’Neil, K. M. (2008). Bringing art to market: The diversity of pricing styles in a local art market. Poetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2007.12.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.