Cited by 63Music History and CultureMusicology and Musical AnalysisGender, Feminism, and Media

Social and symbolic boundaries in newspaper coverage of music, 1955–2005: Gender and genre in the US, France, Germany, and the Netherlands

Schmutz, Vaughn·2009·Poetics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.poetic.2009.06.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classical music profession has been dominated by men for generations due to its high-status reputation and history of discrimination against women.

    “the overall gender differences in the classical music profession, which has been dominated by men for generations due to its high-status reputation and its history of discrimination against women (Schmutz, 2009).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmutz, V.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Schmutz, Vaughn
Venue
Poetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
298-314
ISSN
0304-422X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1982902718
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
72.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Poetics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Musicology and Musical Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
gender and music, music genres, popular music, classical music, media attention, musical hierarchy, social boundaries, symbolic boundaries, women in music, cross-national comparison, United States, France, Germany, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review