The DOI matches its Crossref record; 104 of the 104 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges
Open accessAbstract
The evidence-based policy (EBP) movement has sought to promote rigorous analysis of service programs and policy options in order to improve the quality of decision-making. Rigorous research findings are seen as useful and necessary inputs for policy-makers in their ongoing consideration of policy development and program review. This article provides a critical overview of the research literature on evidence-based policy in the context of government policy-making and program improvement. Particular attention is given to the rational expectation that improved policy analysis will flow from a better evidence base, with consequent improvements in the service delivery and problem-solving capacities of government agencies. This expectation is contrasted with the practical limitations on rational processes typical in the real world of political decision-making, which is characterised by bargaining, entrenched commitments, and the interplay of diverse stakeholder values and interests. Key issues for consideration include the forms of evidence that are of greatest relevance or utility for decision-makers, and the most productive forms of interaction between the producers and the users of research and evaluation findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action
Checkoway, B., & Schon, D. A. (1985) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.2307/3324262 · Cited by 21,268
The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action
Stewart, C. J. (1984) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/0738-3991(84)90022-3 · Cited by 19,752
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Mills, C. W. (1959) · The Mississippi Valley Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1891592 · Cited by 8,191
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness
Adkisson, R. V. (2008) · The Social Science Journal · doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2008.09.003 · Cited by 5,543
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0 · Cited by 5,304
Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-5664 · Cited by 4,089
Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006) · doi:10.1002/9780470754887 · Cited by 3,586
Theories of the Policy Process
Sabatier, P. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780367274689 · Cited by 3,490
The Many Meanings of Research Utilization
Weiss, C. H. (1979) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/3109916 · Cited by 2,222
Cited by
Shield, K., Manthey, J., Rylett, M., Probst, C., Wettlaufer, A., Parry, C. D. H., & Rehm, J. (2020) · The Lancet Public Health · doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(19)30231-2 · Cited by 523
The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: a systematic review of advice to academics
Oliver, K., & Cairney, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0232-y · Cited by 363
Newman, J., & Head, B. W. (2017) · Policy and Society · doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1361635 · Cited by 96
Self-citationOliver, K., & Pearce, W. (2017) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0045-9 · Cited by 79
How to build models for government: criteria driving model acceptance in policymaking
Kolkman, D. A., Campo, P., Balke-Visser, T., & Gilbert, N. (2016) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-016-9250-4 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Head, B. W.
- Venue
- Policy and Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 77-94
- ISSN
- 1449-4035 (ISSN-L)
- 1839-3373
- OpenAlex
- W2071252207
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 104
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
- The paper
- Head, B. W. (2010). Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.