A novel supramolecular shape memory material based on partial α-CD-PEG inclusion complex
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recovery ratios of 97% were obtained for inclusion contents of 60 wt% in α-cyclodextrin-PEG/PEG SMP.
“recovery ratios of 97% were obtained for inclusion contents of 60 wt%.”
From Review on the Functional Determinants and Durability of Shape Memory Polymers (2010) · cites this paper as [200]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 78
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Yu, Z., Govender, T., Luo, H., & Li, B.
- Affiliations
- Sichuan University (CN)
- University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Sheng
- Venue
- Polymer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3205-3210
- ISSN
- 0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082264732
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 5.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polymer (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
- Keywords
- shape memory effect, α-cyclodextrin, polyethylene glycol, inclusion complexes, shape recovery ratio, shape memory mechanism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
