Nanodroplet formation and exclusive homogenously nucleated crystallization in confined electrospun immiscible polymer blend fibers of polystyrene and poly (ethylene oxide)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In electrospun PEO/PS (30/70) blend fibers, when annealing temperature is below 95°C, the majority crystallizes heterogeneously at around 40°C; when annealing temperature is above 125°C, fibers break into numerous nanodroplets and homogeneous/surface-induced nucleation at large undercooling dominates due to lack of heterogeneities.
“When the annealing temperature is below 95 °C, the temperature is not enough to break the largest part of the electrospun fibers, therefore, the majority of PEO/PS blend will crystallize heterogeneously at around 40 °C ( Fig. 10 A).However, when the annealing temperature is above 125 °C, PEO/PS blend fibers break into numerous nanodroplets and homogeneous/surface-induced nucleation at large under”
From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
In PEO/PS nanofibers, neat PEO has Avrami index around 3 at 53°C indicating 3-D unconfined crystal growth after instantaneous nucleation; annealing at 85°C and crystallizing at 48°C gives Avrami index 2.1, revealing 2-D confined crystal growth after instantaneous nucleation; annealing at 150°C gives Avrami index around 1 at 0 or -10°C, confirming homogeneous or surface-induced nucleation.
“As a comparison, the crystallization kinetics of neat PEO was also studied, and the Avrami index around 3 at 53 °C indicates a 3-D unconfined crystal growth after instantaneous nucleation.When P4tBS coated PEO/PS fibers were annealed at 85 °C and then cooled down to crystallize at 48 °C (near the higher fractionated T c ), the Avrami index decreased to 2.1, revealing a 2-D confined crystal growth”
From Fractionated crystallization in semicrystalline polymers (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 50
- Authors
- Zhong, G., Wang, K., Zhang, L., Li, Z.-M., Fong, H., & Zhu, L.
- Affiliations
- South Dakota School of Mines and Technology (US)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fong, Hao
- Zhu, Lei
- Venue
- Polymer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 5397-5402
- ISSN
- 0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993873447
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polymer (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese Scholar Council
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
- Keywords
- homogeneous nucleation, electrospinning, polystyrene, poly(ethylene oxide), Rayleigh-Plateau instability, annealing, nanoconfinement effect, crystallization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review