The DOI matches its Crossref record.
3-D magnetic graphene oxide-magnetite poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite substrates for immobilizing enzyme
Abstract
Abstract Three-dimensional magnetic graphene oxide-magnetite polyvinyl alcohol (3D-GO/PVA/Fe3O4) nanocomposites were successfully prepared. The morphology was characterized and analyzed through scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The chemical structure and the crystal structure were explored by X-ray powder diffraction (XPS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction spectra (XRD). The magnetic property was obtained by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). The specific surface area and the average pore size were determined by Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH). The specific surface and the average pore size of 3D-GO/PVA/Fe3O4 nanocomposites were 388.87 m2g-1 and 9.6 nm, and the higher specific surface indicated that the three-dimensional structure avoided the aggregation for GO sheets. The large saturation magnetization (Ms) of the nanocomposites of 30.5 emu/g enabled the easy cycling of the nanocomposites. The 3D-GO/PVA/Fe3O4 nanocomposites exhibited better performance for porcine pancreatic lipase (PPL) enzyme immobilization. The maximum immobilization efficiency was 91%, and the enzyme immobilized 3D-GO/PVA/Fe3O4 nanocomposites reached up to 90% of their activities. After 10 cycles of reuse, the activity of immobilized enzyme remained about 70.8% of the initial activity. The stability test revealed that the activity of immobilized enzyme remained up to 71.1% at 4 °C for 56 days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Electromagnetic Interference Shielding Polymers and Nanocomposites - A Review
Jiang, D., Murugadoss, V., Wang, Y., Lin, J., Ding, T., Wang, Z., Shao, Q., Wang, C., Liu, H., Lu, N., et al. (2019) · Polymer Reviews · doi:10.1080/15583724.2018.1546737 · Cited by 729
Self-citationElectrically conductive polymer composites for smart flexible strain sensors: a critical review
Liu, H., Li, Q., Zhang, S., Yin, R., Liu, X., He, Y., Dai, K., Shan, C., Guo, J., Liu, C., et al. (2018) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c8tc04079f · Cited by 709
Self-citationQi, H., Teng, M., Liu, M., Liu, S., Li, J., Yu, H., Teng, C., Huang, Z., Liu, H., Shao, Q., et al. (2019) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.047 · Cited by 640
Self-citationS‐Scheme Heterojunction TiO2/CdS Nanocomposite Nanofiber as H2‐Production Photocatalyst
Ge, H., Xu, F., Cheng, B., Yu, J., & Ho, W. (2019) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.201901486 · Cited by 375
Strategies of enzyme immobilization on nanomatrix supports and their intracellular delivery
Sharifi, M., Karim, A. Y., Mustafa Qadir Nanakali, N., Salihi, A., Aziz, F. M., Hong, J., Khan, R. H., Saboury, A. A., Hasan, A., Abou-Zied, O. K., et al. (2020) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2019.1643787 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, Y., Jing, T., Xu, G., Tian, J., Dong, M., Shao, Q., Wang, B., Wang, Z., Zheng, Y., Yang, C., & Guo, Z.
- Venue
- Polymer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 13-22
- ISSN
- 0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808944911
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3-D magnetic graphene oxide-magnetite poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite substrates for immobilizing enzyme. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.046
- The paper
- Li, Y., Jing, T., Xu, G., Tian, J., Dong, M., Shao, Q., Wang, B., Wang, Z., Zheng, Y., Yang, C., & Guo, Z. (2018). 3-D magnetic graphene oxide-magnetite poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposite substrates for immobilizing enzyme. Polymer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.