Colored polyurethane foams with enhanced mechanical and thermal properties
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even though the test duration was only 2 days, similar conclusions have been made after 14 days of exposure at different conditions of PUR foam with pigment filler.
“Even though the test duration was only 2 days, similar conclusions have been made after 14 days of exposure at different conditions of PUR foam with pigment filler [62].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augaitis, N., Vaitkus, S., Członka, S., & Kairytė, A. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13235336 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Członka, S., Sienkiewicz, N., Kairytė, A., & Vaitkus, S.
- Affiliations
- Lodz University of Technology (PL)
- Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (LT)
- Corresponding author
- Członka, Sylwia
- Venue
- Polymer Testing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 105986
- ISSN
- 0142-9418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2957667356
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Polymer Testing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Foaming and Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Polymer Science and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Cellular and Composite Structures
- Keywords
- red pigment, composite foams, compressive strength, flexural strength, water absorption, thermal conductivity, thermal stability, mechanical properties, color features, apparent density, dimensional stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
