Influence of different type of impermeable phase on the permeability of PLA films: Nanofillers versus crystalline phase
Open accessAbstract
Different amorphous PLA-based nanocomposites series allowing to vary the nanofiller shape from spherical (hydrophobic/hydrophilic silica, silver), to tubular (halloysites) and lamellar (montmorillonite, graphene) have been prepared for filler content up to 15 vol%. In parallel, a semi-crystalline PLA films series has been prepared by annealing amorphous PLA films from the glassy state with the aim to achieve different degree of crystallinity. The polymer chains mobility and the impermeable domains (either filler domains or crystalline phase) contained in each membrane have been characterized in detail. Membranes water vapor and oxygen permeability coefficients have been determined with the aim to evidence the governing factors for barrier properties. For nanocomposite membranes, the matrix microstructure and chain mobility were not significantly affected by the addition of fillers, so the barrier properties were mainly governed by the filler domains size and dispersion. For semi-crystalline membranes, the increase in crystallinity led to a decrease of the amorphous chains mobility ( MAF ) which was found to also influence the permeability. Theoretical models were used to describe the evolution of the experimental relative permeability and an equivalence diagram was proposed to have a direct comparison of the effect of fillers and crystallinity on the permeability. • A wide range of PLA-based nanocomposites films were prepared by melt-blending. • Semi-crystalline PLA films were obtained by annealing at 110 °C and 120 °C. • The factors governing the barrier properties were identified for each film series. • Permeability models were adapted to each membrane series. • An equivalence diagram was proposed to compare crystallinity and fillers effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Influence of crystal polymorphism on mechanical and barrier properties of poly(l-lactic acid)
Cocca, M., Lorenzo, M. L. D., Malinconico, M., & Frezza, V. (2011) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.02.009 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Tsuji, H., & Tezuka, Y. (2004) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm049835i · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Jullin, A., Sudre, G., Hascoët, N., Chinesta, F., & Espuche, E.
- Affiliations
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Arts et Métiers (FR)
- Venue
- Polymer Testing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-01
- Volume
- 142
- Pages
- 108682
- ISSN
- 0142-9418 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405811036
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 0.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Polymer Testing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-EQPX-0010)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Keywords
- polylactic acid, PLA nanocomposites, polymer nanofillers, crystallinity, water vapor permeability, oxygen permeability, barrier properties, chain mobility, filler dispersion, halloysite, montmorillonite, graphene, silica, silver nanoparticles, annealing, permeability model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review