Cited by 269Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementNanocomposite Films for Food PackagingFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Potential of the biopolymer chitosan with different molecular weights to control postharvest gray mold of tomato fruit

Badawy, Mohamed E.I., Rabea, Entsar I.·2009·Postharvest Biology and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.05.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Badawy, M. E. I., & Rabea, E. I.
Affiliations
Alexandria University (EG)
Corresponding author
Badawy, Mohamed E.I.
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
110-117
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2134324896
Cited by
269
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
chitosan, molecular weight, Botrytis cinerea, gray mold, tomato fruit, postharvest disease control, antifungal activity, storage temperature, polyphenol oxidase, phenolic compounds, plant defense response, fungitoxicity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review