Cited by 43Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlBanana Cultivation and Research

Effects of sodium bicarbonate on pathogenicity of Colletotrichum musae and potential for controlling postharvest diseases of banana

De Costa, D.M., Gunawardhana, H.M.D.M.·2012·Postharvest Biology and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.02.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
De Costa, D. M., & Gunawardhana, H. M. D. M.
Affiliations
University of Peradeniya (LK)
Venue
Postharvest Biology and Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
68
Pages
54-63
ISSN
0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048228924
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Banana Cultivation and Research
Keywords
sodium bicarbonate, Colletotrichum musae, anthracnose, crown rot, blossom end rot, biological control, dip treatment, sporulation, appressoria, integrated disease management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review