Integrating plant defense inducing chemical, inorganic salt and hot water treatments for the management of postharvest mango anthracnose
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The treatments also maintained quality of mango, positively affecting pH, soluble solid content (SSC), TA, firmness, and peel color.
“The treatments also maintained quality of mango, positively affecting pH, soluble solid content (SSC), TA, firmness, and peel color.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Dessalegn et al., 2013
CaCl2 treatments alone or combined with preharvest plant defense inducers did not significantly reduce anthracnose severity on mango.
“In contrast to SBC, CaCl2 treatments alone or combined with preharvest plant defense inducers did not significantly reduce anthracnose severity on mango (Dessalegn et al., 2013).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Dessalegn et al., 2013
Cites
Mango Anthracnose: Economic Impact and Current Options For Integrated Management
Arauz, L. F. (2000) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.2000.84.6.600 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Effect of ammonium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate on anthracnose of papaya
Sivakumar, D., Hewarathgamagae, N. K., Wilson Wijeratnam, R. S., & Wijesundera, R. L. C. (2002) · Phytoparasitica · doi:10.1007/bf02979753 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Hong, K., Gong, D., Zhang, L., Hu, H., Jia, Z., Gu, H., & Song, K. (2016) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.041 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Khan, M. R., Chonhenchob, V., Huang, C., & Suwanamornlert, P. (2021) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms9040839 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“[15] evaluated the plant defense-inducing chemicals (PDIC) combined with postharvest treatments with inorganic salts and hot water to prevent mango’s anthracnose.”
Background
- Authors
- Dessalegn, Y., Ayalew, A., & Woldetsadik, K.
- Affiliations
- Mizan Tepi University (ET)
- Haramaya University (ET)
- Corresponding author
- Ayalew, Amare
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 83-88
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990171606
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Ethiopia
- Haramaya University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- mango anthracnose, postharvest disease control, salicylic acid, potassium phosphite, hot water treatment, calcium chloride, fruit rot, fruit quality, marketability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
