The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Effect of rhamnolipids on Rhodotorula glutinis biocontrol of Alternaria alternata infection in cherry tomato fruit
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Biocontrol yeasts such as C. laurentii, Cryptococcus flavescens, and R. glutinis have been used in combination with resistance inducers such as salicylic acid or rhamnolipids.
“In some cases, biocontrol yeasts such as C. laurentii, Cryptococcus flavescens, and R. glutinis have been used in combination with resistance inducers such as salicylic acid or rhamnolipids (Yan et al. 2014; Yu and Zheng 2006; Zhang et al. 2007c).”
From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Yan et al. 2014
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Akhtar, 1994, Some studies on post-harvest diseases of tomato fruits and their chemical control, Pak. J. Phytopathol., 6, 125
- Ballester, 2010, Biochemical and molecular characterization of induced resistance against Penicilliun digitatum in citrus fruit, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 56, 31, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2009.10.002 · DOI
- Dixon, 1995, Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism, Plant Cell, 7, 1085, 10.2307/3870059 · DOI
- Feng, 2006, Control of Alternaria alternata by cassia oil in combination with potassium chloride or sodium chloride, J. Appl. Microbiol., 101, 1317, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03024.x · DOI
- Guo, 2014, Inhibition of green mold disease in mandarins by preventive applications of methyl jasmonate and antagonistic yeast Cryptococcus laurentii, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 88, 72, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.09.008 · DOI
- Haba, 2003, Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties of rhamnolipids produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa 47T2 NCBIM 40044, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 81, 316, 10.1002/bit.10474 · DOI
- Janisiewicz, 2002, Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 43, 205
- Kim, 2000, In vivo control and in vitro antifungal activity of rhamnolipid B, a glycolipid antibiotic, against Phytophthora capsici and Colletotrichum orbiculare, Pest Manag. Sci., 56, 1029, 10.1002/1526-4998(200012)56:12<1029::AID-PS238>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
- Lotfabad, 2013, Assessment of antibacterial capability of rhamnolipids produced by two indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, Jundishapur J. Microbiol., 6, 29, 10.5812/jjm.2662 · DOI
- Lu, 2013, Rhodosporidium paludigenum induces resistance and defense-related responses against Penicillium digitatum in citrus fruit, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 85, 196, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.014 · DOI
- Mayer, 1979, Polyphenol oxidases in plants, Phytochemistry, 18, 193, 10.1016/0031-9422(79)80057-6 · DOI
- Nicholson, 1992, Phenolic compounds and their role in disease resistance, Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 30, 369, 10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002101 · DOI · Paper page
- Perneel, 2008, Phenazines and biosurfactants interact in the biological control of soil-borne diseases caused by Pythium spp, Environ. Microbiol., 10, 778, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01501.x · DOI
- Sanchez, 2012, Rhamnolipids elicit defense responses and induce disease resistance against biotrophic, hemibiotrophic, and necrotrophic pathogens that require different signaling pathways in Arabidopsis and highlight a central role for salicylic acid, Plant Physiol., 160, 1630, 10.1104/pp.112.201913 · DOI
- Sha, 2012, Producing cell-free culture broth of rhamnolipids as a cost-effective fungicide against plant pathogens, J. Basic Microbiol., 52, 458, 10.1002/jobm.201100295 · DOI
- Sharma, 2007, Rhamnolipids from the rhizosphere bacterium Pseudomonas sp, GRP 3 that reduces damping-off disease in chilli and tomato nurseries, J. Nat. Prod., 70, 941, 10.1021/np0700016 · DOI
- Soberon, 2005, Production of rhamnolipids by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 68, 718, 10.1007/s00253-005-0150-3 · DOI
- Sotirova, 2012, The importance of rhamnolipid-biosurfactant-induced changes in bacterial membrane lipids of Bacillus subtilis for the antimicrobial activity of thiosulfonates, Curr. Microbiol., 65, 534, 10.1007/s00284-012-0191-7 · DOI
- Spotts, 1986, Populations, pathogenicity and benomyl resistance of Botrytis spp., Penicillium spp. and Mucor piriformis in packing houses, Plant Dis., 70, 106, 10.1094/PD-70-106 · DOI
- Tian, 2006, Induction of defense responses against Alternaria rot by different elicitors in harvested pear fruit, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 70, 729, 10.1007/s00253-005-0125-4 · DOI
- Varnier, 2009, Bacterial rhamnolipids are novel MAMPs conferring resistance to Botrytis cinerea in grapevine, Plant Cell Environ., 32, 178, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01911.x · DOI
- Vatsa, 2010, Rhamnolipid biosurfactants as new players in animal and plant defense against microbes, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 5095, 10.3390/ijms11125095 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, Biocontrol of Alternaria alternata on cherry tomato fruit by use of marine yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum Fell & Tallman, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 123, 234, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.002 · DOI
- Wang, 2010, Control of postharvest decay on cherry tomatoes by marine yeast Rhodosporidium paludigenum and calcium chloride, J. Appl. Microbiol., 109, 651, 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04693.x · DOI
- Yoo, 2005, Characteristics of microbial biosurfactant as an antifungal agent against plant pathogenic fungus, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 15, 1164
- Yu, 2014, γ-Aminobutyric acid induces resistance against Penicillium expansum by priming of defence responses in pear fruit, Food Chem., 159, 29, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.011 · DOI
- Yu, 2013, Effect of pyrimethanil on Cryptococcus laurentii, Rhodosporidium paludigenum, and Rhodotorula glutinis biocontrol of Penicillium expansum infection in pear fruit, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 164, 155, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.04.012 · DOI
- Yu, 2007, Synergistic effect of chitosan and Cryptococcus laurentii on inhibition of Penicillium expansum infections, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 114, 261, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.09.008 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, F., Xu, S., Chen, Y., & Zheng, X.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zheng, Xiaodong
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 32-35
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2089864678
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- rhamnolipids, Rhodotorula glutinis, Alternaria alternata, cherry tomato, biological control, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, surfactants, postharvest disease control, fruit decay, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, induced resistance, yeast colonization, carbon source utilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review