CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The emotional weight of I love you in multilinguals’ languages

Dewaele, Jean-Marc·2008·Journal of Pragmatics
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expressing love can have different meaning and emotional attachment among multilingual speakers, dependent on personal experience and cultural connotations.

    “Dewaele (2008, 2013) continually and strategically explores the relationship between emotion and language in a variety of contexts, and found that expressing love can have different meaning and emotional attachment among multilingual speakers, dependent on both personal experience and cultural connotations (Dewaele, 2008).”

    From ‘Half of who you are’: Parent and child reflections on the emotional experiences of reversing familial language shift (2023) · cites this paper as Dewaele, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Altarriba, 2003, Does cariño equal ‘liking’? A theoretical approach to conceptual nonequivalence between languages, International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, 305, 10.1177/13670069030070030501 · DOI
  2. Altarriba, 2004, The distinctiveness of emotion concepts: a comparison between emotion, abstract, and concrete words, American Journal of Psychology, 117, 389, 10.2307/4149007 · DOI
  3. Altarriba, 2004, Affective priming: the automatic activation of arousal, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 248, 10.1080/01434630408666531 · DOI
  4. Altarriba, 1994, Current perspectives on using linguistic and cultural factors in counseling the Hispanic client, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 25, 388, 10.1037/0735-7028.25.4.388 · DOI
  5. Barron, 2007, Acquisitional pragmatics: focus on foreign language learners, Intercultural Pragmatics, 4, 113, 10.1515/IP.2007.008 · DOI
  6. Besemeres, 2004, Different languages, different emotions? Perspectives from autobiographical literature, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 140, 10.1080/01434630408666526 · DOI
  7. Derné, 1994, Structural realities, persistent dilemmas, and the construction of emotional paradigms: love in three cultures, Social Perspectives on Emotion, 2, 281
  8. Dewaele, 2004, Blistering barnacles! What language do multilinguals swear in?!, Estudios de Sociolingüística, 5, 83
  9. Dewaele, 2004, The emotional force of swearwords and taboo words in the speech of multilinguals, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 204, 10.1080/01434630408666529 · DOI
  10. Dewaele, 2005, Investigating the psychological and the emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: obstacles and possibilities, The Modern Language Journal, 89, 367, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00311.x · DOI
  11. Dewaele, Jean-Marc, in press. Appropriateness in foreign language acquisition and use: some theoretical, methodological and ethical considerations. International Review of Applied Linguistics 46 (4). · DOI
  12. Dewaele, 2002, Emotion vocabulary in interlanguage, Language Learning, 52, 265, 10.1111/0023-8333.00185 · DOI
  13. Garces-Conejos Blitvich, 2006, Interlanguage pragmatics: a response to Andrew Cohen, Intercultural Pragmatics, 3, 171
  14. Harris, 2004, Bilingual speakers in the lab: psychophysiological measures of emotional reactivity, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 223, 10.1080/01434630408666530 · DOI
  15. Harris, 2003, Taboo words and reprimands elicit greater autonomic reactivity in a first than in a second language, Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 561, 10.1017/S0142716403000286 · DOI
  16. Kasper, 2004, Speech acts in (inter)action: repeated questions, Intercultural Pragmatics, 1, 125, 10.1515/iprg.2004.002 · DOI
  17. Marian, 2004, Self-construal and emotion in bicultural bilinguals, Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 190, 10.1016/j.jml.2004.04.003 · DOI
  18. Mougeon, 2002, État de la recherche sur l’appropriation de la variation par les apprenants avancés du FL2 ou FLE, Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Etrangère, 17, 7, 10.4000/aile.847 · DOI
  19. Panayiotou, 2004, Switching codes, switching code: bilinguals’ emotional responses in English and Greek, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 124, 10.1080/01434630408666525 · DOI
  20. Panayiotou, 2004, Bilingual emotions: the untranslatable self, Estudios de Sociolingüística, 5, 1
  21. Pavlenko, 1999, New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 209, 10.1017/S1366728999000322 · DOI
  22. Pavlenko, 2002, Emotions and the body in Russian and English, Pragmatics and Cognition, 10, 201
  23. Pavlenko, 2002, Bilingualism and emotions, Multilingua, 21, 45, 10.1515/mult.2002.004 · DOI
  24. Pavlenko, 2004, ‘Stop doing that, la Komu Skazala!’: language choice and emotion in parent–child communication, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 179, 10.1080/01434630408666528 · DOI
  25. Pavlenko, 2008, Emotion and emotion-laden words in the bilingual lexicon, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 147, 10.1017/S1366728908003283 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Pavlenko, 2007, Russian emotion vocabulary in American learners’ narratives, The Modern Language Journal, 91, 213, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00541.x · DOI
  27. Petrides, 2006, The role of trait emotional intelligence in a gender-specific model of organizational variables, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 552, 10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00019.x · DOI
  28. Toya, 1996, But I don’t want to be rude: on learning how to express anger in the L2, JALT Journal, 18, 279
  29. Ye, 2004, La Double Vie de Veronica: reflections on my life as a Chinese migrant in Australia, Life Writing, 1, 133, 10.1080/10408340308518247 · DOI
  30. Dewaele, Jean-Marc, Petrides, Dino, Furnham, Adrian, in press. The effects of trait emotional intelligence and sociobiographical variables on communicative anxiety and foreign language anxiety among adult multilinguals: a review and empirical investigation. Language Learning 58 (4). · DOI
  31. Wierzbicka, 2004, Bilingual lives, bilingual experience, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25, 94, 10.1080/01434630408666523 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dewaele, J.-M.
Venue
Journal of Pragmatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1753-1780
ISSN
0378-2166
DOI
10.1016/j.pragma.2008.03.002
Cited by
186
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
British Academy (SG-42593)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review