Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geochemical and numerical constraints on Neoarchean plate tectonics

Open access
Halla, Jaana, van Hunen, Jeroen, Heilimo, Esa, Hölttä, Pentti·2009·Precambrian Research

Abstract

This paper discusses early Neoarchean (2.8–2.7 Ga) plate tectonics by integrating knowledge from new geochemical observations and numerical models. Based on a geochemical dataset of 295 granitoid samples from the Karelian and Kola cratons of the Fennoscandian Shield, we divide Neoarchean juvenile (extracted from oceanic crust or mantle) granitoids into three groups: (1) low-HREE (heavy rare earth elements) TTGs (tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorite) (high SiO2, low Mg, low-HREE, higher Sr, lower Ybn and higher Nb/Ta), (2) high-HREE TTGs (slightly lower range of SiO2, larger range of MgO contents and higher Cr and Ni contents, high-HREE, lower Sr, higher Ybn and lower Nb/Ta), and (3) high Ba–Sr sanukitoids (medium-HREE, high-Mg and high K–Ba–Sr). The main difference between the low- and high-HREE groups lies in their pressure-sensitive element contents, which indicates high-pressure melting conditions for the low-HREE group and low-pressure conditions for the high-HREE group. A possible tectonic scenario for the genesis of the two groups is an incipient hot subduction underneath a thick oceanic plateau/protocrust. Melting in the lower part of thick basaltic oceanic crust could produce TTGs of the low-HREE type, whereas low-pressure melting of subducting slab and possible interactions with the mantle wedge at shallow depths would be capable of generating high-HREE TTGs. The third group of Archean high Ba–Sr sanukitoids was formed after the TTGs. Their low SiO2 and high Mg–K–Ba–Sr contents suggest an origin by melting in an enriched (metasomatized) mantle source, probably as a result of a slab breakoff following a continental collision or attempted subduction of a thick oceanic plateau/TTG protocontinent. Such hypothesis is supported by numerical modeling results that suggest an increased occurrence of slab breakoff in the Archean, which locally increased temperatures within the mantle wedge. More frequent breakoff resulted, because subducting plates were weaker (due to rheologically thinner lithosphere and a thicker basaltic crust), and tensile stresses within the subducting plate were larger (due to a thick crust that transforms from buoyant basalt to dense eclogite).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.precamres.2009.07.008

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Metadata

Authors
Halla, J., van Hunen, J., Heilimo, E., & Hölttä, P.
Venue
Precambrian Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
174
Issue
1-2
Pages
155-162
ISSN
0301-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127940040
Cited by
254
References
2
FWCI
6.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geochemical and numerical constraints on Neoarchean plate tectonics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.07.008
The paper
Halla, J., van Hunen, J., Heilimo, E., & Hölttä, P. (2009). Geochemical and numerical constraints on Neoarchean plate tectonics. Precambrian Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.07.008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.