Cited by 80Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies

Dust to dust: evidence for the formation of “primary” hematite dust in banded iron formations via oxidation of iron silicate nanoparticles

Rasmussen, Birger, Muhling, Janet R., Suvorova, Alexandra, Krapež, Bryan·2016·Precambrian Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.precamres.2016.07.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 80

Authors
Rasmussen, B., Muhling, J. R., Suvorova, A., & Krapež, B.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Rasmussen, Birger
Venue
Precambrian Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
284
Pages
49-63
ISSN
0301-9268 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2504925500
Cited by
80
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Precambrian Research (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
ARC (DP110103660, DP140100512)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Keywords
banded iron formations, jasper, Hamersley Group, iron oxide precipitation, Great Oxidation Event, paleomagnetism, anoxic oceans, iron silicate minerals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review