Making magnetite late again: Evidence for widespread magnetite growth by thermal decomposition of siderite in Hamersley banded iron formations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data suggest that this siderite was diagenetic.
“However, data suggest that this siderite was diagenetic (172, 173), so we omit this proxy from Fig. 3A and Table 1.”
From The Archean atmosphere (2020) · cites this paper as [172]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 59
- Authors
- Rasmussen, B., & Muhling, J. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Rasmussen, Birger
- Venue
- Precambrian Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 306
- Pages
- 64-93
- ISSN
- 0301-9268 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774311917
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Precambrian Research (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Research CouncilAustralian Research Council (ARC) (DP110103660, DP140100512)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
- Keywords
- banded iron formations, magnetite, siderite, thermal decomposition, Hamersley Group, Great Oxidation Event, hematite, greenalite, diagenesis, metamorphism, iron-oxidizing bacteria, chert, fluid flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
