The DOI matches its Crossref record; 257 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of phototransduction, vertebrate photoreceptors and retina
Open accessAbstract
Evidence is reviewed from a wide range of studies relevant to the evolution of vertebrate photoreceptors and phototransduction, in order to permit the synthesis of a scenario for the major steps that occurred during the evolution of cones, rods and the vertebrate retina. The ancestral opsin originated more than 700 Mya (million years ago) and duplicated to form three branches before cnidarians diverged from our own lineage. During chordate evolution, ciliary opsins (C-opsins) underwent multiple stages of improvement, giving rise to the 'bleaching' opsins that characterise cones and rods. Prior to the '2R' rounds of whole genome duplication near the base of the vertebrate lineage, 'cone' photoreceptors already existed; they possessed a transduction cascade essentially the same as in modern cones, along with two classes of opsin: SWS and LWS (short- and long-wave-sensitive). These cones appear to have made synaptic contact directly onto ganglion cells, in a two-layered retina that resembled the pineal organ of extant non-mammalian vertebrates. Interestingly, those ganglion cells appear to be descendants of microvillar photoreceptor cells. No lens was associated with this two-layered retina, and it is likely to have mediated circadian timing rather than spatial vision. Subsequently, retinal bipolar cells evolved, as variants of ciliary photoreceptors, and greatly increased the computational power of the retina. With the advent of a lens and extraocular muscles, spatial imaging information became available for central processing, and gave rise to vision in vertebrates more than 500 Mya. The '2R' genome duplications permitted the refinement of cascade components suitable for both rods and cones, and also led to the emergence of five visual opsins. The exact timing of the emergence of 'true rods' is not yet clear, but it may not have occurred until after the divergence of jawed and jawless vertebrates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ohno, S. (1970) · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · Cited by 7,833
Handbook of Sensory Physiology
Sanders, M. D. (1975) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.59.2.111-c · Cited by 7,166
Darwin, C., Burndy Library, Darwin, C., Edmonds & Remnants, & Henry Sotheran Ltd. (1859) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.59991 · Cited by 6,984
Darwin, C. (1859) · J. Murray eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.68064 · Cited by 4,601
Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution
Dobzhansky, T. (1973) · The American Biology Teacher · doi:10.2307/4444260 · Cited by 3,219
Jacob, F. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.860134 · Cited by 2,690
Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture
Eiraku, M., Takata, N., Ishibashi, H., Kawada, M., Sakakura, E., Okuda, S., Sekiguchi, K., Adachi, T., & Sasai, Y. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09941 · Cited by 2,001
Erwin, D. H., Laflamme, M., Tweedt, S. M., Sperling, E. A., Pisani, D., & Peterson, K. J. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1206375 · Cited by 1,336 · cited 1×
“1 are based on a recent reconciliation of molecular and fossil evidence, as reported by Erwin et al. (2011).”
(2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-1-03742-3 · Cited by 1,308
Parallel processing in the mammalian retina
Wässle, H. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1497 · Cited by 1,252
Cited by
The origin and evolution of cell types
Arendt, D., Musser, J. M., Baker, C. V. H., Bergman, A., Cepko, C., Erwin, D. H., Pavlicev, M., Schlosser, G., Widder, S., Laubichler, M. D., et al. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.127 · Cited by 764
No one knows what attention is
Hommel, B., Chapman, C. S., Cisek, P., Neyedli, H. F., Song, J.-H., & Welsh, T. N. (2019) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01846-w · Cited by 594
Sterling, P., & Laughlin, S. (2015) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262028707.001.0001 · Cited by 482
In vivo delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutics: Progress and challenges
Behr, M., Zhou, J., Xu, B., & Zhang, H. (2021) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.020 · Cited by 210
Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00667 · Cited by 158
“However, this lens-less eye does not have the anatomy required for image-formation or complex pattern-recognition; for example, for the detection of prey or to guide complex locomotion (Lamb et al., 2007, 2008; Fernald, 2009; Lamb, 2011).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamb, T. D.
- Venue
- Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 52-119
- ISSN
- 1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038892197
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 257
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of phototransduction, vertebrate photoreceptors and retina. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.06.001
- The paper
- Lamb, T. D. (2013). Evolution of phototransduction, vertebrate photoreceptors and retina. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2013.06.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.