Cited by 77Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsPluripotent Stem Cells Research

Immunological aspects of RPE cell transplantation

Open access
Sugita, Sunao, Mandai, Michiko, Kamao, Hiroyuki, Takahashi, Masayo·2021·Progress in Retinal and Eye Research

Abstract

Retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells have several functions, including support of the neural retina and choroid in the eye and immunosuppression. Cultured human RPE cells directly suppress inflammatory immune cells. For instance, they directly suppress the activation of T cells in vitro. In contrast, transplanted allogeneic human RPE cells are rejected by bystander immune cells such as T cells in vivo. Recently, human embryonic stem cell-derived RPE cells have been used in several clinical trials, and human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-RPE cells have also been tested in our clinical study in patients with retinal degeneration. Major safety concerns after stem cell-based transplantation surgery include hyper-proliferation, tumorigenicity, or ectopic tissue formation, but these events have currently not been seen in any of these patients. However, if RPE cells are allogeneic, there are concerns about immune rejection issues that have been raised in previous clinical trials. We therefore performed a preclinical study of allogeneic iPSC-RPE cell transplantation in animal rejection models. We then conducted autogenic or allogeneic iPSC-RPE cell transplantation in clinical studies of patients with age-related macular degeneration. In this review, we focus on immunological studies of RPE cells, including iPSC-derived cells. iPSC-RPE cells have unique inflammatory (immunosuppressive and immunogenic) characteristics like primary cultured RPE cells. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current findings obtained from preclinical (basic research) and clinical studies in iPSC-RPE cell transplantation, especially the immunological aspects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2021.100950

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 191 · Cited by 77

Authors
Sugita, S., Mandai, M., Kamao, H., & Takahashi, M.
Affiliations
  • RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research (JP)
  • Kawasaki Medical School (JP)
Corresponding author
Sugita, Sunao
Venue
Progress in Retinal and Eye Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
84
Pages
100950
ISSN
1350-9462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125528791
Cited by
77
References
191
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Retinal and Eye Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP17bk0104002, JP18bm0204002, 18H02959)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
retinal pigment epithelium, allogeneic transplantation, immune rejection, immunosuppression, T cell suppression, retinal degeneration, age-related macular degeneration, stem cell transplantation safety, immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Retina, Stem Cell Transplantation, Retinal Pigment Epithelium, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review