Cited by 65Animal health and immunologyEffects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Effects of management practices, animal transport and barn climate on animal health and antimicrobial use in Swiss veal calf operations

Open access
Schnyder, P., Schönecker, L., Schüpbach-Regula, G., Meylan, M.·2019·Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Abstract

To assess the effects of transport, management factors and barn climate on calf health, 43 Swiss veal farms (11 large farms fattening ≥100 calves and 32 small farms fattening >20 but <100 calves per year) were monitored in a prospective cohort study over a period of one year. Detailed questionnaires on farm structure, management, housing system and animal health were filled out with the farmers during bimonthly visits, and barn temperature, humidity, ammonia and CO2 concentrations were measured. Temperature and humidity were also measured continuously over 72 h once each in winter and summer. In addition, calf purchase and transport from birth farm to fattening unit were documented by the farmers, and the study team accompanied one transport per farm whenever possible. Antimicrobial treatment incidence was calculated from the used daily dose (TIUDD). Risk factors for mortality, average daily weight gain (ADG) and antimicrobial use, as well as factors related to transport and barn climate measures were evaluated with mixed regression models. The overall mortality rate was 5.1% (6.2% in large herds and 3.1% in small ones). Identified risk factors for mortality >3% included a lower number of calves fattened per year and a good hygiene of the feeder. This surprising result was likely due to the fact that the threshold of 3% mortality was rather exceeded in smaller farms. Furthemore, higher temperature variation (range between maximal and minimal temperature over 3 measurement days) in the calf pen was associated with mortality >3% in the univariable analysis. The overall mean ADG was 1.40 ± 0.16 kg. Calf purchase was significantly associated with decreased ADG. The median overall TIUDD was eight daily doses per calf and year (2.1 in small farms and 26 in large farms, respectively); the main indication for treatment was respiratory disease (81.1%). Risk factors for increased TI were no quarantine upon arrival, access to an outside pen, higher numbers of calves per drinking nipple, mechanical ventilation, vaccination against bovine respiratory disease, and a maximum ammonia value >10 ppm in the calf pen. In addition, a higher number of birth farms and calf purchase from markets were associated with increased TI in the univariable analysis. The identified risk factors associated with increased TI and mortality and with decreased ADG should be addressed in priority in veal calf operations to improve calf health and reduce antimicrobial use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount of antimicrobials is higher in calves that have been bought through livestock marts and when calves from multiple sources are amalgamated on a veal farm.

    “The amount of antimicrobials is higher in calves that have been bought through livestock marts and when calves from multiple sources are amalgamated on a veal farm [13], both of which are common factors in veal systems.”

    From Observational study: effect of varying transport durations and feed withdrawal on the physiological status and health of dairy calves (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The table in the indexed copy (labelled 5. Conclusions; page unavailable) reports higher antimicrobial treatment incidence for calves passing through markets than for those that did not (median 15.2 versus 4.6). It also reports higher incidence on farms purchasing calves, but purchasing calves is not the same as amalgamating calves from multiple sources; the passages found do not establish that separate part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ECDC, 2015. Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2015. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Controlhttps://doi.org/10.2900/6928. · DOI
  2. van Rennings, L., Merle, R., von Münchhausen, C., Stahl, J., Honscha, W., Käsbohrer, A., Kreienbrock, L., 2013. Variablen zur Beschreibung des Antibiotikaeinsatzes beim Lebensmittel liefernden Tier. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 126, 297-309. https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-126-297. · DOI

Authors
Schnyder, P., Schönecker, L., Schüpbach-Regula, G., & Meylan, M.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Meylan, M.
Venue
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
167
Pages
146-157
ISSN
0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2922280768
Cited by
65
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (1.16.10)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
veal calves, calf health, antimicrobial use, animal transport, barn climate, calf mortality, average daily gain, respiratory diseases, ammonia, temperature variation, farm size, quarantine, mechanical ventilation, housing systems
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Anti-Infective Agents, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Drug Utilization, Housing, Animal, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Switzerland, Transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review