The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0
Open accessAbstract
In retrospective industrial revolutions always lead to a significant increase in productivity. Thus, the question arises what mechanisms contribute to raise productivity in the current revolution “Industrie 4.0”. Whereas the initial point of all past industrial revolutions can be located in the industry, they resulted in a tremendous change in society. In the present industrial revolution it is the other way around: Reviewing the beginning of the current transformation process, it is not driven by the production industry itself. Instead one of its main drivers is the invention of social networks and smart devices in combination with the employees’ appealing to it. This development of interconnectivity pushes into the industrial sector today. For instance, there exists a desire of employees to bring their own device to work. According to a survey by Accenture 82 percent of the Chinese respondents would be “more resourceful” if they chose their own hardware and software for work. The first three revolutions had a strong focus on the shop floor. This is also true for the present industrial revolution: The public view is merely on its impact on production processes. Therefore, this paper expands this view and additionally analyses the effects of the relating transformation processes to the indirect departments. The paper first analyses the enablers which mainly contribute to Industrie 4.0. Subsequently a reference systems is deduced which consists of basic collaboration mechanisms to increase productivity in the direct and indirect departments. A wide transparency and understanding of those collaboration mechanisms empower producing companies to profit from Industrie 4.0 by deriving individual activities which lead to a growth in productivity and therefore competitiveness. The specified approaches were conducted within the framework of the Cluster of Excellence “Integrative Production Technology in High-Wage countries” of the RWTH Aachen University.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
The World’s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information
Hilbert, M., & López, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200970 · Cited by 1,643
Cited by
Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies
Oztemel, E., & Gursev, S. (2020) · Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8 · Cited by 2,143
Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 · Cited by 1,501
Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., & Gawankar, S. A. (2018) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 · Cited by 1,440
Vaidya, S., Ambad, P., & Bhosle, S. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.034 · Cited by 1,352
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R., & Prote, J.-P.
- Venue
- Procedia CIRP
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 19
- Pages
- 51-56
- ISSN
- 2212-8271 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080363292
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016
- The paper
- Schuh, G., Potente, T., Wesch-Potente, C., Weber, A. R., & Prote, J.-P. (2014). Collaboration Mechanisms to Increase Productivity in the Context of Industrie 4.0. Procedia CIRP. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.05.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.